insaneoctane
Well-Known Member
Unsafe, repetitive,and boring....Does this mean that the Tesla Bot will listen to GLJ and the mainstream media for us and then offer a summary?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah yes, deposits. Good point.
If they did a demo of a Tesla Bot opening a fridge and delivering a beer to someone on a couch, they will sell millions of them.
Unsafe, repetitive,and boring....Does this mean that the Tesla Bot will listen to GLJ and the mainstream media for us and then offer a summary?
.. and remember only those Teslas that the owners have paid for FSD need to be retrofitted. If you haven't bought FSD by that time, then the only option for them is to buy a new Tesla with the latest hardware.doing so is so high any legacy-fleet retrofit costs if needed would be a rounding error.
Looks to me you're applying for a job at Tesla Robotics. Go for it!The non-scary non-dangerous robot criteria conflict with efficiency of motion. Which turns into battery runtime.
I still recall nightmares about a robot spider on Johnny Quest. Centered mass and very light fast limbs use less energy. The complication of the human wrist is likely to get the right combination of speed and strength - not just strength. This says, sort of, efficiency.
If you parrot Elon "control authority" (means leverage but takes you down different thought paths) thinking, and think about the dynamics of moving weight, Popeye forearms can help balance, they have control authority, but they are energy expensive.
To get good balance, reliability and good control authority with an element of grace that does not scare people - you don't want it quicker or stronger than people. It just needs to be so inexpensive to make that the dangerous robots are priced out of the market by being 10X more expensive.
Here is where that "control authority/leverage" thinking leads:
I think this is one way to a not-scary robot that is so inexpensive the scary ones never become economically viable. I think that is what Elon is looking for. It really needs to exist now and be inexpensive. Accommodation for the inexpensive foot would be via snow shoes and the like. Software would compensate using the knee data and core muscles that position the knee through time. That should solve balance cheaply at first blush.
- 4680 batteries in the legs and forearms to provide dynamic balance leverage.
- Simple, relatively stiff ankles where lateral articulation is done by core muscles positioning the knees. The angular displacement of the lower leg translates all the way to the little toe via structural stiffness. There are not many, if any foot muscles. This is a cost, reliability and time decision.
- Proprioceptors in the knees (Proprioception - Wikipedia) would use some bandwidth.
View attachment 699026
Edit: Would probably have alternative locations for 4680s so that architectural mistakes do not scuttle the effort. A full string can be configured with and without using the arm and calf battery compartments.
I don't think that is the case, and that isn't what was said.
HW4 will always do better, but HW3 can do enough was the message,
HW4 will simply advance the march of the 9's
Dog-Bot. The best part is no part.Last night after the presentation I had to walk the dogs. Where was my Dog-walkerbot?
Elon, git off yer butt...so I don't have to.
I disagree, Robot revenue is possible next year IMO. My point stated earlier, I'm ready to buy one when it comes out, so would everyone here practically. Sight unseen, cash, done it before with the Model 3. Besides, it can sit with us and watch TV until it learns to do something, just like a baby. "Hey Tesla"... know any new tricks?
The cost of replacing HW2 to HW2.5 to HW3 to HW4 for FSD owners is easily justified as the cost of developing FSD...Tesla has been putting the best HW they have in production into all vehicles to build the fleet and collect the data they need to perfect FSD. If that means upgrading HW for FSD owners a few times....drop in the bucket IMO.That's the important part. Even if it were a sensor issue. The cost to add a camera to older models would be nothing compared to the value. Same with the computer as you mentioned.
Deposits. I never even saw the Model 3 when I signed up. Sure, deposits aren't big revenue, but if we saw 1M reservations stemming from large corporations looking to save labor costs and start the training ASAP, what do you think the stock would do? I'd personally give more than $1K deposit and accept a Beta unit gladly, I'm in Alpha/Beta land now anyway.