Wicket
Member
Speaking only for myself, this is profoundly incorrect. It is the attraction of shallow weak thinking that has drifted away from first principles thinking and toward wishful thinking that is high risk. First principles thinking is foundational and low risk and minimizes expensive lazy mistakes IMO.
How do others consider first principles thinking? As investors, how do we rate engineering competence when we invest?
if someone told you that you had to design something to knock in nails then most often using something ‘like one of the hammers at Home Depot‘ as analogy works rather than starting from scratch and pondering the nature of nails and wood in your particular state and situation and etc. But in a market scenario if you happen to design a better hammer which is unlikely you get a big payoff but most likely you fail to notice something surprising. The more formal coding of this is parametric (1st principals) vs non parametric (analogy). it’s the difference between predicting 2030 vehicles by guessing rather without reference to other examples what the regression shape is vs. finding say that Ford had a very similar pattern in 1908-1911 as you did in 2018-2020 and going with that.