38 mpg is a pretty efficient car, like toyota corolla on a highway. So, the worst mix areas do better with EVs than pretty much any ICEs.
And trucks etc. do a triple damage compared to "good".
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
And trucks etc. do a triple damage compared to "good".
bhtooefr
Active Member
The average new light duty vehicle in the US for the same time period (calendar year 2016) got 22.0 MPG per Average Fuel Efficiency of U.S. Light Duty Vehicles | Bureau of Transportation Statistics.
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Lol, good point! But let's be clear, the original phrasing is "shortseller enrichment commission", first used here on Oct 4, 2018 by our own @oneday (but after Elon's tweet)
Clearly, this phrasing jabbed a nerve. Elon awaits the outcome with a 'baited' line (as do we).
Cheers!
Last edited:
ZachF
Active Member
It's because Western coal (mined primarily in WY) is the only coal left that is somewhat economical. Appalachian coal is on it's deathbed, getting completely murdered by the Marcellus shale gas.
Most of the red line is produced west of the Mississippi (It's also dirtier).
As far as dirtiness goes its (from least to most) anthracite > bituminous > sub-bituminous > lignite
mblakele
FSD Beta (99)
Hmm, I don't see an answer in that article. It seems to be about what Sonnenfeld wants the SEC to think. But I'm not sure what that has to do with the terms of the consent decree.
You asked another person:
Shouldn't the SEC be pleased by any choice that honors the consent decree? If not, why didn't they get terms into the decree that would satisfy them?
I'm asking you because you've been hinting at past experience with the SEC, in an adversarial role. So I'd welcome your insight.
My dad(coming from Beijing) laughs at how we construct anything in the U.S. Our major highway has been under construction since I was in MIDDLE SCHOOL. I am sure there are plastic cones on this highway from when I was born. It's even messier today than 5 years ago.
China on the other hand can construct a bridge in a few weeks..which is the amount of time it took Tesla to get my permit for my solar panels..lol.
Actually it would be fusion powered as it is solar energy that evaporates the water and....
But water powered sounds so much more steam punk cool.
sundaymorning
Active Member
Some new development on trade talks with China.
China makes unprecedented proposals on tech transfer, trade challenges — US officials
China makes unprecedented proposals on tech transfer, trade challenges — US officials
t doesn't
Like Steve Jobs before him, Elon is a once in a generation visionary who is also a bit of an iconoclast. That doesn't fit well into the SEC's humorless, rule oriented view of the world. I think the SEC negotiated Elon stepping down as chairman of the board and agreeing to appoint two independent directors as a means of ensuring greater oversight of Elon and to rein him in a bit. Aside from being a good friend of Elon's, Larry Ellison is cut from the same cloth. It would be like appointing Mark Cuban to the board.
So, based upon what I know of the Commission, and govt bureaucrats in general, I would say that Ellison would not have been the SEC's first choice for the position.
But I've been wrong before, as we are all aware.
Like Steve Jobs before him, Elon is a once in a generation visionary who is also a bit of an iconoclast. That doesn't fit well into the SEC's humorless, rule oriented view of the world. I think the SEC negotiated Elon stepping down as chairman of the board and agreeing to appoint two independent directors as a means of ensuring greater oversight of Elon and to rein him in a bit. Aside from being a good friend of Elon's, Larry Ellison is cut from the same cloth. It would be like appointing Mark Cuban to the board.
So, based upon what I know of the Commission, and govt bureaucrats in general, I would say that Ellison would not have been the SEC's first choice for the position.
But I've been wrong before, as we are all aware.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
I wonder if rooftop solar is included in the “solar” category. If not, the graph should be titled “electricity generation by utility companies”
Yep, it's Sonnenfeld baiting the SEC for his friend Chanos. SEC took the bait and filed for contempt first chance they got. And Cramer just used the same strategy to try to bait the judge into viewing EM as an adversary.
Don’t have a link to the post but I do believe @Fact Checking came up with the term before Elon’s tweet.Lol, good point! But let's be clear, the original phrasing is "shortseller enrichment commission", first used here on Oct 4, 2018 by our own @oneday (but after Elon's tweet)
Clearly, this phrasing jabbed a nerve. Elon awaits the outcome with a 'baited' line (as do we).
Cheers!
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Indeed I recall a discussion too. So before I commented, I looked for usage of that phrase. A search indicates your's was the first relevant use of the word "enrichment" in this forum beginning Sep 1st, 2018. First use I found by @Fact Checking was Oct 12, 2018.
Of course, if someone was to post a link of earlier usage, then we'd have evidence, wot?
Cheers!
P.S. So this doesn't turn into a 'slobberfest' this will be my last comment on the topic, which seems somewhat silly.
Goldman Sachs controls that "self-regulating" FINRA.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
