lafrisbee
Active Member
You
Making a sentence read well is the responsibility of the writer. not the reader. The writer could write out "Model S" (or Morgan Stanley) ONE time and then everyone would know which they are talking about.
The worst of the lot invent their own acronyms.
But it needs to stop completely across the board because the practice is detrimental to the flow of information. Period.
You are like the child that has his parents tie his shoes because it is so easy when they do it. There is NO credible source that believes using acronyms is acceptable in a common area. And if it was just "EV" acronyms I would not have mentioned it... but in any one page on this forum I will encounter acronyms of chemistry, finance, and even ones that people just make up...like referring to the Model S as MS, and then the next post will refer to Morgan Stanley as MS. Then there are those that write LIP when they are referring to LFP's, just because they can...It takes but seconds to help yourself. It takes more time for someone to repeatedly type out that which is common knowledge to those in their circle.
Please consider a simple Google search next time. Here's two links to get you started:
EV acronyms.
All acronyms.
Making a sentence read well is the responsibility of the writer. not the reader. The writer could write out "Model S" (or Morgan Stanley) ONE time and then everyone would know which they are talking about.
The worst of the lot invent their own acronyms.
But it needs to stop completely across the board because the practice is detrimental to the flow of information. Period.