oh, weird, I thought it was windmills.... /sSo German carmakers were conspiring to kill people for profits?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh, weird, I thought it was windmills.... /sSo German carmakers were conspiring to kill people for profits?
It's because nobody listens to him. Gordon Johnson of fairfax financial short and distort scheme, working with Chanos at the time. This guy should simply be barred from being an analyst. He and Anton Whalman are cut from the same cloth.TSLA is up premarket despite the latest and greatest price target cut:
"Vertical Group says Tesla running out of car buyers, cuts price target to $54. (link: http://dlvr.it/R2Cww6) dlvr.it/R2Cww6 "
Since it appears to have been missed from before, I'll reiterate: what you are describing in no way requires a large data set. If you have a trillion records and ten of them represent an edge case, how would you even know? How would you find them when the problem is that they haven't been labeled? It does you absolutely no good. And, if you do know you need it, odds are pretty good that out of those ten you might have two or three that are usable (obscuration issues, focus issues, repeats of same presentation, etc.).I don't look at it this way. The larger the data set, more examples of a particular edge case you can find to include - apart from more edge cases. If it was small - you have to go and specifically collect those data sets, and you will be limited to what you can easily collect.
What about inertial dampeners? I need some in my Model S ludicrous.They also have once in a while very good deals on flux capacitors.
Group buy?What about inertial dampeners? I need some in my Model S ludicrous.
OT but relevant I think.
The new 8.5 update for Nav on Autopilot is a HUGE step forward in the system. At least that was my first impression this morning when I tried it for the first time. VERY impressed. This stuff is happening folks...and people are going to want it.
Dan
Well, the rest ofOh come on, you never look at pricing for bulk industrial chemicals such as alumium powder and beryllium ore? Seriously, am I the only one who does this?
Source?
I'm so confused, who will protect the shortseller's interests when he tweets that he is making the worlds biggest factory(ies) to replace oil based transportation, or tweets progress related to such? Or does he now have to pretend his cars run on something else than electricity...Have an app that delays any tweets made by Musk during market hours (including pre-market & after-market trading hours) delayed until there is no trading activity in the US. Continue to have all tweets monitored after-the-fact by legal, as is already in place.
If Elon really wants to get a tweet out during market hours, has to go through a review process unless utterly clear it is non-Tesla. If he really wants to get a Tesla tweet out during market hours, than get the Tesla account to tweet it out, and Elon can retweet it. In this scenario, Elon not having direct access to the Tesla account, and those that do, needing legal's approval to post an Elon tweet request for the Tesla account.
Elon can't mess this arrangement up in a 'violation,' sense. He can only mess up in the sense of tweeting on his Tesla account during restricted hours and then 5 minutes later, when he sees there's been no response to his tweet, remembering there is the tweet-delay portion of the day, and what he just tweeted is in limbo until later in the day.
Drop the confusing terms of the existing agreement.
SEC can take away from this that Elon will not tweet material information re Tesla during market hours.
Elon can take away from this that he can tweet as he did before this whole mess, but, during an explicit timeframe... 5pm to 1am Pacific time, his tweets will have a delayed release. Elon won't have to remember when to stay on or off his twitter account. I'm sure he won't like being restricted re immediate feedback, but, he's a busy guy, and it gives him a good chunk of the day without any of the awkward attempts to restrict him in the settlement. He'll just get in the habit of doing his tweets late in the day... which is when they tend to happen already.
Investor can take away, this would be a response to keep an event like the $420 tweet from occurring again without clarification/correction before being traded on. With this, investors would continue to have the benefit of Elon being able to communicate in this way that he feels is critical for Tesla. Yes, he'd be restricted to an 8 hour window each day to tweet without review, but, how much time a day does Elon hit twitter anyway? He's said maybe 15-20 minutes... plus, he'd have the ways to tweet anytime described above.
What are the alternatives?
- Is there some realistic negotiation of the ~contains, or could reasonably contain material information~ phrasing of the existing policy we think is going to happen?
- Do we think there will be any negotiation that will be agreed to that doesn't allow both the SEC and Elon/Tesla to feel like they can say they walked away with what mattered to them? What else can we see happening that would let both parties say that?
I really think it is in investors interest that Tesla/Musk & the SEC do work out an unambiguous solution in this two week window set up by the Judge. Put aside the "who wins over who" tunnel vision, and just pick something realistic and unambiguous that meets the basic interests of all parties.
It’s called “dancing around the 420 issue”Is that confirmation of new FSD chip in cars being built?
Oh come on, you never look at pricing for bulk industrial chemicals such as alumium powder and beryllium ore? Seriously, am I the only one who does this?
Tesla Got an Early Lead, but Luxury Electric Rivals Are Racing to Catch Up
Here we have the latest anti Tesla FUD from the yellow rag known as the NYT.
Best part is that not only is Tesla DOOMED by all the legacy car manufacturers that are going after Tesla’s market share with the introduction of multiple BEVs (with no mention of what all these new BEVs might do to their ICE business overall) but the NYT hurries to take a swipe at BEVs in general, bringing up this exotic thing called a ‘Level 2 charger’ which costs ‘thousands of dollars’ and how necessary it is to achieve a 20mph charging rate, which is still not enough!
I read this rag to keep the enemy close, but It is a chore I must admit.
No... the superbottle has nothing to do with that.Quasi. No physically adjusted vents, but using intersecting planes of air to control direction and power of it.
Confession:
Yesterday I liquidated my TSLA position at open (my broker doesn't do pre-market trades). In hindsight I think it was a huge mistake and I'm buying it all back this morning. It hurt my cost basis by about $8/share. I was expecting a drop to continue throughout the morning and wasn't sure if there would be negative SEC repurcussions but neither happened.
The mistake cost me a few thousand bucks in the short term, but I'm still confident that long-term I'll be in really good shape. (Stock would have to drop a lot for me to come out with a loss overall due to TSLA, so I'm luckier than most).