UK data confirm Tesla 10x safety advantage.
Tesla: 28 accidents per 10000 cars, Toyota: 270.
Also noteworthy that the cars with the highest crash rate had 5 star safety ratings (!).
View attachment 667503
if they used percentages then Tesla should be on top.Car Leasing News & Blog | Rivervale Leasing
Rivervale Leasing’s Car Leasing news and blog. All the latest car leasing related news and deals.www.rivervaleleasing.co.uk
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
We’re better today than yesterday from cars, airplanes to medical equipment because of new generation. I’m sure tomorrow will be better than today.you old farts just don’t eat to let it go that’s why
What is wrong with young people today? - A view from the past.
The following quotes illustrate that adults always complained about the behavior of the younger generation - even back in the days of the an...proto-knowledge.blogspot.com
Eat to .. missed typosWe’re better today than yesterday from cars, airplanes to medical equipment because of new generation. I’m sure tomorrow will be better than today.you old farts just don’t eat to let it go that’s why
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
I think you completely missed the point.We’re better today than yesterday from cars, airplanes to medical equipment because of new generation. I’m sure tomorrow will be better than today.you old farts just don’t eat to let it go that’s why
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
JRP3
Hyperactive Member
So you're saying Elon and Tesla engineers are idiots.
I
Answer the implied question:
If vision is ready for primetime, why do the S and X still ship with radar?
I'm saying he's too susceptible to outside forces.
Answer the implied question:
If vision is ready for primetime, why do the S and X still ship with radar?
2daMoon
Mostly Harmless
Are there any instances in Tesla history where Elon and his minions have invoked "The best part is no part" that has resulted in less of anything positive for the product on a long term basis?
2daMoon
Mostly Harmless
Because it takes time to make those production changes to a working line.
Perhaps the focus was first on the lines that would make the most difference and they will follow up on the other lines (phase 2) once they are done with phase 1 of the radar removal initiative.
2daMoon
Mostly Harmless
Not an acceptable rebuttal.
If it's not ready, then ship all cars with previous tech.
Very obvious and simple unless one is experiencing a shortage. Just admit it.
My nephew has Down syndrome; but he clearly knows better how to use a thesaurus than you do.
May I suggest you avoid using insulting slurs to express yourself on this forum. Sure makes you seem primitive and mentally challenged…this comment seems to belong on Twitter or Facebook.
I can give you directions if you need them.
Last edited:
2daMoon
Mostly Harmless
I apologize. My mistake was in thinking you were looking for a rational explanation, rather than an emotional one.
Edit: Though I have no personal experience managing multiple automotive production lines I would find it challenging to admit that there is any aspect of removing a part and the associated processes that would be considered "obvious and simple" from any perspective.
Last edited:
I
, I’ve had @Knightshade on block for quite a while (spacecash just joined him). Didn’t realize that was his avatar.
life’s too short to spend it with trolls. I rather enjoy understanding contradictory opinions; but when one cannot simply accept that these are opinions, and that there may actually be someone more qualified than them making the decisions, I lose patience quickly. When that same person starts demanding that others admit they are wrong; well that’s where I draw the line.
This place does seem to turn into the Twitter comment section on weekends or when the SP isn’t pushing all time highs.
, I’ve had @Knightshade on block for quite a while (spacecash just joined him). Didn’t realize that was his avatar.life’s too short to spend it with trolls. I rather enjoy understanding contradictory opinions; but when one cannot simply accept that these are opinions, and that there may actually be someone more qualified than them making the decisions, I lose patience quickly. When that same person starts demanding that others admit they are wrong; well that’s where I draw the line.
This place does seem to turn into the Twitter comment section on weekends or when the SP isn’t pushing all time highs.
Candidly your grammar is quite deficient, and you fail to understand the development fo new technological approaches. For nearly everything, when a major technological advance happens, the very first implementation has some deficiencies compared to the previous technology. Soon, very soon, the new approach proves to be far more capable.
Specifically with reference to vision only vs radar and vision, there is a very simple and practical reason why vision will be a superior solution.
That is inherent in radar, which requires sending a signal, receiving a return, then processing the results of the returns. That takes time and huge amounts of signal processing.
In vision only systems the lags are far shorter than for radar, partly because signal ambiguity and lack of specificity are not major processing issues.
Both are valuable, but radar is ill-equipped to handle highly variable signal returns. Vision, OTOH, requires less processing because the signal is inherently visual to begin with.
That is an overly simplistic description, to be sure. It does help explain why a mixed system creates insoluble issues precisely because the signal timing is not perfectly equivalent, radar has slower updates and less detail.
Superficial analysis invariably yields inaccurate results.
Many people, ostensibly well-informed are devoted to lidar just as others are to radar. Both technologies have excellent use cases. In neither case is driving automation an ideal use case. In all driving automaton cases technological advances can render obsolete some earlier choices. Both lidar and radar fit in this category.
Vision, of course, has limitations. Whenever vision will be inadequate we may well find that road-going vehicles should not be operated at all. Blinding snow , torrential rain, volcanic eruptions are all cases where no potential solution will be likely to enable safe road-going vehicle operation at all.
For that matter airplanes cannot safely operate through volcanic ash, nor in blinding snow, nor unusually heavy precipitation. No matter what sensory will be chosen none will ever solve every conceivable problem.
In the meantime within a few weeks vision only will be superior to previous vision+radar.
Looks like we may switch back to ordering an X...but holy crap...expected deliver is February. Which is fine for us as we are not getting back to camping until next spring. But wow. Is this just backlog or are they not going to start producing for awhile. Geesh. (Not really complaining...just whining. 
. Until then Jarvis, our model 3 will work fine.
. Until then Jarvis, our model 3 will work fine.Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
