But wasn't that their Cybertruck prior forecast as well, mid-2023? If so, then we can say it is sticking already, (but needs to continue to stick to dates as you say). Delivery dates would be a bit later of course.
Because somebody is from the future!!!!Why is that obvious. It's only Wednesday?
Really ? You forget that it was Dennis Hong (UCLA) who was going crazy about DOJO before the first AI day. Tesla have been working with the experts in bipedal for a long time before announcement of Optimus.
Geopgraphical is the ambition, but will not work till they harmonise production specs at both sites.
Your DOJO comment is in alignment with me. I said I think they're ahead in AI. As far as bipedal abilities go, time will tell. In the meantime we can all agree to hope that I'm wrong.
This TFLEV video clearly explains why Tesla will never need paid advertisement. Teslas simply sell themselves.The Ford Lightning racing again a Tesla and the truck limits the power down to 74% and then back up again so they must have the same WOT issues.
Go to the 7 minute mark.. The teslas racing that day (well everyday) we’re crushing everything that lined up against them.
No Reuters headline specifically says “Tesla plans 2 week suspension of Shanghai production”
Guess they missed their chance saying "will be shut down in 2022"...technically also correct.
So "harmonise", is that like Samsonise?
The 9.55s time was a Model S Plaid, not the 3P as you listed in the table against the Corvette, also the 9.97 against the Merc.
Thanks doubleZ. Corrected as above.
I'm all for hoping a four day shutdown is all that's needed. But the translation really only says that the whole factory has to be powered off for four days. Nowhere does it say that the upgraded lines are ready in those four days. Potentially all the other areas of the factory could be up and running in four days while the actual production of the cars could take two weeks. So both the four days and two weeks figures could be "correct".
Agree. Reuters know exactly what lies they are perpetrating . Now many other paid media outlets are repeating Reuters falsehoods with their "according to Reuters" claim so they can plead ignorance when the truth comes out. Will they retract their articles and apologize? No. Where is their fact checking? Paid Media does not care about the truth, only lining their own pockets.
Optimist, aren’t you? Look how pervasive that “$7.11” gas&diesel price calumny has become in no time at all.
I’m old enough to remember when Reuters and AP were stodgy news wire services with no agenda.
Keep in mind.....we still haven't seen the email that caused the 10% down day a couple Friday's ago........No one has seen that email. Not a single person. Nadda.
