B
betstarship
Guest
Source: https://home.treasury.gov/policy-is...al-institutions-and-fiscal-service/debt-limit
![cumulative-co-emissions.png](https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/cumulative-co-emissions.png)
Source: Visualizing Changes in COâ‚‚ Emissions Since 1900
Source: Here's how CO2 emissions have changed since 1900
![Thinking face :thinking: 🤔](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f914.png)
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dig deeper. That level scales up as you add dependents, very quickly as well.
The comments section of that WaPo article are very toxic.
If the sentence starts with "Elon Musk is a fraud" or Elon Musk is a proven liar", it is deemed as a bot and pay no attention to them.The comments section of that WaPo article are very toxic.
Fun thought experiments, especially since we're living it in real time. So margins would increase but so might healthcare costs (for the business). A tax on EV charging is what I'd expect, hopefully to pay for more solar and save the grid! It's gonna be our fault we wrecked the grid trying to push too hard... and right when Hoover Dam stops. Catch 22.q - if the cost of energy goes down with clean energy products/services, then will every person's/business' profit margins on products/services (thus, investments too) go up? Would that lead, applying occam's razor, to more taxes to reduce down the debt significantly?
q - if the cost of energy goes down with clean energy products/services, then will every person's/business' profit margins on products/services (thus, investments too) go up? Would that lead, applying occam's razor, to more taxes to reduce down the debt significantly?
Took a look. Wow.The comments section of that WaPo article are very toxic.
As someone who has a free online subscription to that "newspaper" (from my employer) I can tell you all WaPo comment sections are toxic.The comments section of that WaPo article are very toxic.
Fun thought experiments, especially since we're living it in real time. So margins would increase but so might healthcare costs (for the business). A tax on EV charging is what I'd expect, hopefully to pay for more solar and save the grid! It's gonna be our fault we wrecked the grid trying to push too hard... and right when Hoover Dam stops. Catch 22.
Hertz has also announced their intention to buy 65,000 Geely/Volvo EVs and 175,000 GM EVs by 2025. Volvos, I can see. GM, I think not. In any case, it looks like a layup for 25% EVs of some kind by the end of next year.Hertz ended 2022 with about 50k Telsas in their 428.7k fleet, and fell short of the 100k Teslas by 2022 goal they headlined in Oct 2021. So by saying 25% of their fleet will be EVs by EOY 2024, it seems they are simply reiterating 100k Teslas, but 2 years late.
Took a look. Wow.
Fun thought experiments, especially since we're living it in real time. So margins would increase but so might healthcare costs (for the business). A tax on EV charging is what I'd expect, hopefully to pay for more solar and save the grid! It's gonna be our fault we wrecked the grid trying to push too hard... and right when Hoover Dam stops. Catch 22.
Consider how the "cost" of pretty much everything is mostly based upon the price of energy needed to create, transport, display, etc. any product or service. This idea you have can be extrapolated out to reveal the potential of a society with significantly reduced dependence upon taxes, and possibly, even upon money.
Basic needs might be easily provided for all without it being a burden upon anyone. How would that change the paradigm?
Perhaps Gene Roddenberry was onto something?
The commitment to buy GM EVs is something that looks good in press, but won't actually cost them anything, because GM won't have 175k EVs to sell them by then.Hertz has also announced their intention to buy 65,000 Geely/Volvo EVs and 175,000 GM EVs by 2025. Volvos, I can see. GM, I think not. In any case, it looks like a layup for 25% EVs of some kind by the end of next year.
Bots?Yeah, always amusing to watching the entitled sheep go after . . . basically anyone. Toxic group that's NEVER happy with any decision.
Entitled electric sheep. I hope never to dream of them.Bots?
Don't forget that some states, like Oregon, require at least one 350kW stall at each NEVI site. But I guess you could install a third-party charger for that in addition to the Superchargers, but that would probably significantly complicate the power sharing implementation.
Internet trolls: Musk wasting money sending up useless rocketsYeah, always amusing to watching the entitled sheep go after . . . basically anyone. Toxic group that's NEVER happy with any decision.
Sometimes if the high volume event was known about in advance, and there was sufficient space, some additional Megapacks / chargers on trailers could be plugged in.I don't have the energy right now to try to calculate out if a Megapack could support a single high volume site during a high-volume event. (Holiday/Conference/meteor shower weekend, etc.)
The start of every conversation seems grounded, then they attack in numbers. Really does look like bots.Yeah, always amusing to watching the entitled sheep go after . . . basically anyone. Toxic group that's NEVER happy with any decision.