Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.

Last month, Tesla sold over 3,500 of its recently refreshed Model 3 sedan, making it the best-selling passenger car in Australia. On the back of these elevated levels of new Tesla deliveries, used Tesla Model 3 stock is also now nearly at an all-time high.

Tesla has sold 4,316 of its electric sedan in 2024 after having a slower start to its deliveries in January.
 
Many people here have a lot of their net worth on the line in this stock. Lots of people have millions of dollars invested.

A TMCer has killed themself because of poor options betting on TSLA overhype. Many others have lost millions.

If a trader loses money trading options that's on him im afraid, all trading and investments are by nature risky. You need to be aware of that before clicking the buy button. But some simple advice when trading TSLA is never trade options, never trade on margin and only invest capital that you can see drop 50%+ and still hold (long term). This is similar to what Elon has advised many times.
 
Last edited:
Dodger was genuine long term buy and hold investor, he never advocated short term trading strategies.

So if you are making the claim that in 5 years time TSLA at the current share price is bad investment, make that explicit.

Genuine long term buy and hold investors are immune to FUD, and I can see why those intending to spread FUD find that annoying.
Are we now at a point where also the reality is labeled "FUD"? I am a genuine long term buy and hold investor, have been invested in TSLA since 2015, and I want fact based and balanced discussions here, and welcome both those negative and positive to the stock, short or long term. What's the point of an echo chamber?
 
I havent seen this posted?
F150 lightning is in real trouble.
Legacy automaker Ford (NYSE:F) announced that it’s cutting jobs at the Dearborn, Michigan factory responsible for the F-150 Lightning electric truck due to a dip in electric vehicle demand. Out of 2,100 workers at the Rouge Electric Vehicle Center, 700 will shift to the Michigan Assembly Plant, aiding in the production of the Bronco and Ranger, while another 700 will stay at the F-150 plant. The rest face the decision between a $50,000 retirement offer or relocation within Michigan.
I'm sure the mainstream media would rather do cartwheels than suggest that the cybertruck is now taking EV truck buyers attention. I reckon we will have to see 4x the CTs sold per quarter than the lightning before any mainstream media grudgingly accepts it. Will likely happen this year.
 
I'm a bit confused, so maybe someone can help me out here.

I was under the impression that for a while now all Model Ys delivered in (western) Europe were being built in Berlin. My daily observation during my commute in The Netherlands of trailers full of Model Ys going from east (Germany) to west (The Netherlands, Belgium, UK) supported this thesis. However, the last few weeks I've been seeing the opposite: trailers full of Model Ys going from west (the harbors of Rotterdam or Zeebrugge) to east (Germany, Denmark, maybe even Scandinavia).

The only conclusion I can draw: Shanghai is still exporting Model Ys to western Europe. Is this a new development or was I mistaken and have they been doing this all along?
 
Could you expand on this? Are you saying Dojo will push Tesla to try to influence how TSMC designs and builds their next fabrication plant?
After watching Karpathy's recent interview I gleaned something I think is very important with regard to Dojo.

He was talking about how horribly inefficient today's GPU's are. Even NVIDIA's best are power hungry monsters that just don't do their jobs very well compared to the low-power human brain at only about 20 watts. It's obvious that when it comes to AI hardware, we are doing it wrong.

Clearly, there is unbelievable potential for improvement.

So the Dojo project can be justified on the basis that AI hardware is in its infancy. It's time for exploration. Like the gold rush, most will fail, but the one who digs in the right spot will be richly rewarded.

There's gold in them thar hills!
 
F150 lightning is in real trouble.
This is a real shame. It will be many years before Tesla can possibly make enough Cybertrucks to meet the market demand for pickups.

I've been wondering a lot if Ford is going to end up having a very close relationship with Tesla. Ron Baron keeps talking about how cars will be like PC's with "Intel inside". But it will be "Tesla inside". Ford is the prime candidate for licensing deals that could make this a reality.

Technical issues aside, if you could put a Ford F-150 body on a Tesla drive train and use Tesla's in-car operating system, you would have a winner that would benefit both companies and hugely benefit the mission.
 
After watching Karpathy's recent interview I gleaned something I think is very important with regard to Dojo.

He was talking about how horribly inefficient today's GPU's are. Even NVIDIA's best are power hungry monsters that just don't do their jobs very well compared to the low-power human brain at only about 20 watts. It's obvious that when it comes to AI hardware, we are doing it wrong.

Clearly, there is unbelievable potential for improvement.

So the Dojo project can be justified on the basis that AI hardware is in its infancy. It's time for exploration. Like the gold rush, most will fail, but the one who digs in the right spot will be richly rewarded.

There's gold in them thar hills!

Nvidia’s GPUs are general purpose AI devices. They are not as efficient as google’s TPUs at doing certain things. Google tailors its TPUs to its internal workloads. Likewise Dojo should be more efficient at video training because it is optimized for FSD.

Nvidia chips are incredibly efficient for what they are. Of course, there is always room for improvement on the chip design and integration side but the types of improvements in power you are describing require fundamental material science advancements in the process node. That is way beyond Tesla or Nvidia’s domain.
 
After watching Karpathy's recent interview I gleaned something I think is very important with regard to Dojo.

He was talking about how horribly inefficient today's GPU's are. Even NVIDIA's best are power hungry monsters that just don't do their jobs very well compared to the low-power human brain at only about 20 watts. It's obvious that when it comes to AI hardware, we are doing it wrong.

Clearly, there is unbelievable potential for improvement.

So the Dojo project can be justified on the basis that AI hardware is in its infancy. It's time for exploration. Like the gold rush, most will fail, but the one who digs in the right spot will be richly rewarded.

There's gold in them thar hills!
Not sure I follow, are you saying Tesla should invest in Dojo to be able to compete with NVIDIA in selling chips? Or how might Tesla be "richly rewarded" by this?
 
I'm a bit confused, so maybe someone can help me out here.

I was under the impression that for a while now all Model Ys delivered in (western) Europe were being built in Berlin. My daily observation during my commute in The Netherlands of trailers full of Model Ys going from east (Germany) to west (The Netherlands, Belgium, UK) supported this thesis. However, the last few weeks I've been seeing the opposite: trailers full of Model Ys going from west (the harbors of Rotterdam or Zeebrugge) to east (Germany, Denmark, maybe even Scandinavia).

The only conclusion I can draw: Shanghai is still exporting Model Ys to western Europe. Is this a new development or was I mistaken and have they been doing this all along?
I thought the SR version still came from Shanghai, or at least some of them do.
 
Nvidia’s GPUs are general purpose AI devices. They are not as efficient as google’s TPUs at doing certain things. Google tailors its TPUs to its internal workloads. Likewise Dojo should be more efficient at video training because it is optimized for FSD.

Nvidia chips are incredibly efficient for what they are. Of course, there is always room for improvement on the chip design and integration side but the types of improvements in power you are describing require fundamental material science advancements in the process node. That is way beyond Tesla or Nvidia’s domain.
Karpathy was suggesting that there is a ton of potential gain in just improving computer architecture to be more suitable to the task.

So yes, I think Karpathy would agree with most of what you said.

But I don't think he would say the potential solutions lie only with material science. A vastly more efficient way to "do AI" in silicon could still get us a lot closer to the goal. The reason for this optimism is because the enormous delta between the efficiency of the brain and the (in)efficiency of a GPU cluster suggests that huge gains could still be made with architecture alone.

I guess you could also make the argument that Karpathy is not a computer architecture guy. So what does he know? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: scaesare
This is a real shame. It will be many years before Tesla can possibly make enough Cybertrucks to meet the market demand for pickups.

I've been wondering a lot if Ford is going to end up having a very close relationship with Tesla. Ron Baron keeps talking about how cars will be like PC's with "Intel inside". But it will be "Tesla inside". Ford is the prime candidate for licensing deals that could make this a reality.

Technical issues aside, if you could put a Ford F-150 body on a Tesla drive train and use Tesla's in-car operating system, you would have a winner that would benefit both companies and hugely benefit the mission.
At least until no one wants an old fashioned style truck. This will be similar to the change from tall skinny cars to low wide cars that happened mostly in the 1950s. Even as a kid back then I knew that tall and skinny meant an old car.
 
Not sure I follow, are you saying Tesla should invest in Dojo to be able to compete with NVIDIA in selling chips? Or how might Tesla be "richly rewarded" by this?
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not a computer architecture guy and I'm also not an AI guy. So my understanding is quite limited to my old-fashioned computer science training. But here is my best shot at this:

Dojo is competing with NVIDIA by using a different architecture. So there is a potential for Dojo to have a breakthrough that blows the doors off NVIDIA and the other players. Because we are so early in this field, it's possible for Dojo to become the undisputed leader in AI hardware. With such power would come enormous riches. If you can train AI models a lot more efficiently than everyone else, you will win the AI future. Whether that means "Dojo as a service" or just that Tesla has neural nets that vastly outperform everyone else, it boils down to huge profits.

But Elon is right when he tells us that this is a bit of a long shot. There are several players and we don't know who will win. So Dojo is high risk, high reward.
 
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not a computer architecture guy and I'm also not an AI guy. So my understanding is quite limited to my old-fashioned computer science training. But here is my best shot at this:

Dojo is competing with NVIDIA by using a different architecture. So there is a potential for Dojo to have a breakthrough that blows the doors off NVIDIA and the other players. Because we are so early in this field, it's possible for Dojo to become the undisputed leader in AI hardware. With such power would come enormous riches. If you can train AI models a lot more efficiently than everyone else, you will win the AI future. Whether that means "Dojo as a service" or just that Tesla has neural nets that vastly outperform everyone else, it boils down to huge profits.

But Elon is right when he tells us that this is a bit of a long shot. There are several players and we don't know who will win. So Dojo is high risk, high reward.
OK. To me that sounds a bit too much of a longshot to assign it much value.
 
I'll preface this by saying that I'm not a computer architecture guy and I'm also not an AI guy. So my understanding is quite limited to my old-fashioned computer science training. But here is my best shot at this:

Dojo is competing with NVIDIA by using a different architecture. So there is a potential for Dojo to have a breakthrough that blows the doors off NVIDIA and the other players. Because we are so early in this field, it's possible for Dojo to become the undisputed leader in AI hardware. With such power would come enormous riches. If you can train AI models a lot more efficiently than everyone else, you will win the AI future. Whether that means "Dojo as a service" or just that Tesla has neural nets that vastly outperform everyone else, it boils down to huge profits.

But Elon is right when he tells us that this is a bit of a long shot. There are several players and we don't know who will win. So Dojo is high risk, high reward.

Dojo is never going to beat Nvidia across a wide suite of applications. It lacks the software ecosystem to be a general purpose solution. It’s
not going to be the “undisputed leader in AI hardware”. If all it ever does is be more efficient at FSD training than Nvidia it would be a huge win for Tesla.

Tesla has just barely managed to cross the minimum compute threshold for FSD. They still need to increase data and compute by another order of magnitude. Musk’s instructions to offer free FSD trials has as much to do with data as increasing take rate.
Training for full autonomy will probably require on the order of a million chips. At $30k per H100, that is $30 billion in NVDA chips. Now figure in the power required at about 500w per chip.

Each D1 chip probably costs Tesla about $5k and consumes half the power. Dojo will save Tesla tens of billions.
 
Last edited: