DarkandStormy
Active Member
Pepsi confirmed last month they still haven't received their full 100 order.
Last edited:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On the most recent Batteries Included podcast, it was discussed how Chargepoint used a model you describe of servicing chargers/having folks at various locations buying chargers and the site hosts managing/profit from it, trying to make $$ from it, . This model and the chargers eventually become abandoned because it's still not a proven business model that charging can be a big enough profitable business to be worth the high upfront cost.
I personally don't think businesses can make enough $$ from pure charging yet (think gas stations). Charge too high, no one will really use it. Charge too low, you lose $$.
If it's too high on corridor routes, most would just take their ICE vehicle.
Tesla had a vested interest in making the SC network awesome since 100% of their customers may or had to use it and unlike gas, they needed the SC network to allow their cars/customers to actually go further than 200-300 miles or a Tesla owner would've never really been able to leave their city.
Pushing this on a 3rd party who again, is only going to do it for profits seems short sighted, especially if it's truly that profitable as you seem to claim. With Tesla cutting expansion, new sites and not wanting to own it themselves, complaining that profit margins aren't what they want (hence, the move to software margins), how are you going to convince a local entity to do this when they really don't care what their customer's drive to their store/destination and Tesla doesn't want it?
The current live/deployed SC network should be fine (for now unless they can the whole service/maintenance team). Tesla will only be shooting themselves/all their customers in the foot if service/uptime got worst.
It affects very little other users since most other EV brands can't use the SC yet.
A typical method is to have the dummy stationary, and then just before the car passes, pull a string to put it in front of the car in a fraction of a second. No real person moves like that. It probably takes a few tries to get it just right.I don't understand this troll manages to get the car hit these objects, when every video that has been posted by anyone else has the car avoid hitting people of all sizes and shapes.
I don't think Tesla are fully leaving the cheap car market, but they are clearly putting more resources into the direction that can genuinely differentiate their product vs competition.1. That noise you hear is Porsche designers in Germany throwing their ashtrays against the wall after seeing this Taycan knockoff.
2. One can leave a market or one can compete. Tesla was ready to compete profitably with the Gen 3 platform consumer product. Tesla will still compete with a product based on a present platform. The consumer is interested in the product. not how it's built.
One cannot boast, "Where is the competition?" Then leave the market when competition arrives.
One cannot boast, "Where is the competition?" Then leave the market when competition arrives.
Well, I gave them the account that has 9 shares and a couple of hundred bucks, so any data breach will not be devastating. And who knows, perhaps Say will refund the losses.Then why use Say if this concerns you (which I agree it should?)
There’s no passed involved…
Log into your Tesla account -> profile settings-> shareholder preferences -> verify manually
Where you’ll find:
Manual Verification
Manual shareholder status verifications will be reviewed internally by Tesla
Please submit your brokerage statement as of April 15, 2024. This document must show:
Number of Tesla Shares
- Your full name
- Number of TSLA shares held
- Statement date of April 15, 2024 (or your April 2024 statement)
- Other information, such as account number, address, and non-Tesla holdings, can be redacted
- Please submit a single PDF document for all your brokerage statements
One PDF file, max size 10 MB
Well, I gave them the account that has 9 shares and a couple of hundred bucks, so any data breach will not be devastating. And who knows, perhaps Say will refund the losses.
The vote comes through my broker. I already voted all the shares in all the accounts.One vote per share.
You will only be able to vote the number of shares you have provided.
If you have multiple accounts with TSLA shares, the manual verification method will net you more votes, while also not providing password info to Say.com. Rather, just sharing a PDF of a recent statement from the broker to Tesla.
The vote comes through my broker. I already voted all the shares in all the accounts.
I did not use the word data anywhere.Hold on. Your data is that people who dont want one mock it, and your relatives cancelled orders? Thats not data, thats anecdotes. Nobpdy was expecting 100 million sales. If 99% of the population of the planet hate the cybetruck, it can still multiple millions of units.
And what throttle back of production? when? at what point did Tesla claim they are reducing production goals for the vehicle. Show me the primary source.
There has been zero indication of them doing anything other than ramping production as fast as they can.
most people don’t want pickups.Wrong. In 5 years the CT will be the best selling truck in the US. Also, it will be the best selling vehicle in the US.
9 shares? That you, Tornetta?Well, I gave them the account that has 9 shares and a couple of hundred bucks, so any data breach will not be devastating. And who knows, perhaps Say will refund the losses.
One vote per share.
You will only be able to vote the number of shares you have provided.
If you have multiple accounts with TSLA shares, the manual verification method will net you more votes, while also not providing password info to Say.com. Rather, just sharing a PDF of a recent statement from the broker to Tesla.
Edit: insert Embarrassed emoji here. All the above is sooooo wrong when the purpose is to get perks and an invite from Tesla to the AGM.
I don't understand this troll manages to get the car hit these objects, when every video that has been posted by anyone else has the car avoid hitting people of all sizes and shapes.
Where? Who?It’s been reported they reduced shifts on the line.
"Reduction in accidents is good for society but bad for insurance companies."
They're misunderstanding the announcement, it's regarding "hard to trace" minerals, not trace (meaning rare earth?) minerals and Tesla packs are currently not eligible due to to Chinese components, not minerals.
Bro, I'm not paying for insurance if there are no chances for accidents/injuries. That would be giving your money away for free!Surely a reduction in accidents is good for insurance companies? Continue to collect premiums without needing to pay out as much in claims?
Or are they saying in the long-term, car insurance will cease to be mandated and not be purchased anymore?