There's a gap between the Model 3 Performance and Model S Long Range that Tesla needs to fill

[csammy]

As I lean towards Tesla for my next purchase, I can't help but notice there is a big gap in price and performance between a Model 3 Performance and Model S Long Range. And not a small gap either, a pretty significant one.

Model 3 Performance - 11.8 @ 116 / 52k

Model S Long Range - 10.8 @ 130 / 84k


Why hasn't Tesla filled this gap. It seems some higher variant of the Model 3 could be missing. One that could be in the 60-70k range and runs low 11's with low 120's trap speed. 11.2 @ 122 for example.

I know Elon Musk isn't stupid so there must be a reason for this because it's clear as day. I just don't know the reasoning behind having this gap.

 

[jjrandorin]

Because then you end up like BMW or Mercedes, who are cutting models because they have too much segmentation. There is no additional market to capture with such a car.

Now, if the question is, "why doesnt the model 3 have a ludicrous option" or something like that, I imagine that is because you dont want to discourage people from buying your higher trim.

BTW.. the model 3 performance IS in the "60-70k" range, so perhaps you mean 75-85k range?

 

[GtiMart]

I'll give you an opinion: car manufacturers are looking at high volume sales to maximize their profits. They need to build cars that a lot of people will buy. The Model 3 and Y fit that bill pretty well. The Model 3 performance rivals many higher-priced performance cars already. Manufacturers will also create a few models that are low-volume in some niches but that's to attract attention. The Model S Plaid is one such example. You can see that as marketing almost. There is no need to fill any gap unless it's a 100,000 car plus business.

 

[Dan Detweiler]

Let's get the Cybertruck, Semi, Gen 2 Roadster and 25K model up and running before we worry about more variants of existing models.

Just my take on it.

Dan

 

[Accentcreate]

As I lean towards Tesla for my next purchase, I can't help but notice there is a big gap in price and performance between a Model 3 Performance and Model S Long Range. And not a small gap either, a pretty significant one.

Model 3 Performance - 11.8 @ 116 / 52k

Model S Long Range - 10.8 @ 130 / 84k


Why hasn't Tesla filled this gap. It seems some higher variant of the Model 3 could be missing. One that could be in the 60-70k range and runs low 11's with low 120's trap speed. 11.2 @ 122 for example.

I know Elon Musk isn't stupid so there must be a reason for this because it's clear as day. I just don't know the reasoning behind having this gap.

A great way of filling the gap would be to offer more choice in colours, upholstery/interior fit-out etc. The difference between the interior of a Model 3 and a Model S is quite stark. We are not all obsessed with performance.

 

[Watts_Up]

Air suspension for the Model 3 and Model Y had been mentioned as a possible future option, this could add another(?) $5k to $10k.