MikeQ
Member
Has anyone seen the commercials paid for by VW featuring a Chevy Bolt? Wonder why a Tesla wasn't in there.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
Why is there no news from Tesla's side regarding the go private? Elon not saying anything? Investors must be kinda pissed write now.
voip-ninja
Give me some sugar baby
Because going private takes time.... and they are already having to talk to the SEC about Musk saying go private had funding. Sure, they should start blabbing left and right about their plans and give their opponents more openings to throw hand grenades at them.
This falls under category "don't feed the bears".
Given that the "5000" cardboard was placed in the wind shield of the 5000th car that came off the assembly line, I think that is what Tesla/Elon measured. Since that car came off the line at 2AM, I doubt it went through the entire QA before the announcement for meeting the goal. The biggest short term benefit for Tesla was that it boost the moral for everyone's hard work and personal sacrifice, in my opinion. The biggest long term benefit is that they were able to fix multiple hard issues with the lines in short order to allow sustained 5000/week production for multiple weeks in July, and to ramp up further in August.
Maybe traders, for whom volatility and time are crucial, not investors. Investors should be pissed with misinformation.
You probably need a judge on the set to make sure a Tesla appears in the ad.
America should be truly proud to have Tesla as a car manufacturer and force VW to comply with the sentence they received after the Diesel scandal.
Hint, the Bolt is not a threat for VW but Tesla is ...
Last edited:
Why is it misleading to state a simple true fact without commentary or embellishment? Are you suggesting that the denizens of this forum cannot do the math to place this fact in context?
The Blue Owl
Endangerous Herbivore
Because the point he was making was, in his words, that "much of the short interest is unhedged". Your single fact, simply stated, with no other qualification or explanation, leaves the impresion that it is relevant to his point, or balances it somehow in a significant fashion, which it is not and it does not.
His comment was not about the said denizens, but about your post. The post can be viewed as misleading (I view it that way), regardless of whether forum readers are being successfully misled or not.
At a minimum, if your post, put in context, does not mislead anyone because they work it out for themselves that the impact of those options on his main point is negligible, it is irrelevant and is simply wasting everyone's time.
Willfully Obtuse, Constantly posting misleading info, unwilling to respond to factual corrections, seemingly only here to muddy the waters...might be joining the other bird on ignore.
Sell! A new Tesla killer has emerged and it's a beaut.
The maker of the AK-47 wants to sell electric cars
Seriously why does this look like it came from the 1950's? Can't the Russians find someone that can design something moderately attractive?
The maker of the AK-47 wants to sell electric cars
Seriously why does this look like it came from the 1950's? Can't the Russians find someone that can design something moderately attractive?
It seems odd that with up to 39.1 million short, and according to Ihor of S3 that it's about 33.47 million short, recently,
Someone, somewhere, is a "Short tracker"?
been hunting here
https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla/institutional-holdings
If for instance an Institution holds "zero" shares, but recently sold between 9,000 and 200,000, that they could have continued "selling", believing the stock price will decline
Anyway from NASDAQ reporting, all i can find (Does anybody track who is short 33,470,000 shares and break it out?)
Someone, somewhere, is a "Short tracker"?
been hunting here
https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/tsla/institutional-holdings
If for instance an Institution holds "zero" shares, but recently sold between 9,000 and 200,000, that they could have continued "selling", believing the stock price will decline
Anyway from NASDAQ reporting, all i can find (Does anybody track who is short 33,470,000 shares and break it out?)
I wonder how the drag coefficient of that monstrosity compares to the Tesla models...
It looks like Russia "found" the plans for the 1987 Jeep Cherokee/Wagoneer and made a few mods.
It is another Boring Company Flamethrower delivery event.
I read this, and it gives a tiny shiver. When I have mentioned elsewhere, I get very vehement responses about "not, no never, ever naked short" so, Who sold those 33.74 million shares? why did my "radar" perk up with a 'hmm, how many are naked and will be torched when not long ago there were comments about "triply leveraged"
Is it possible to ferret out these statistics?
where to start, i'm retired and have lots of free time......(between travels)
hmm, why would they be doing a second event? seems strange/unprecedented for any of elon’s companies. is there something different about this event that wasn’t covered at the delivery party in LA? sorry i’m behind on this topic.
They don't want to, or can't, ship them so they are holding delivery events in different locations to try to get everyone to come pickup their not-a-flamethrower.
They have talked about having a crew take a van around the country to personally deliver them, but large delivery events are more cost effective.
Last edited:
Interesting he didn't have the report to look at. There is a link in the dedicated thread to the report and I posted a breakdown of their cost estimates. Boils down to this:
Breakdown of Black, Long Range RWD, PUP Car
Price $49,000
Factory Cost $34,720
*Operations $10,650
Operating Profit $3,630
Breakdown of Black, Standard Range, RWD non-PUP car
Price $35,000
Factory Cost $30,250
*Operations $10,650
Operating Profit $-5,900
*Operations consist of D&A, Warranty, Freight, R&D, SG&A
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
