humbaba
sleeping until $7000
While this is true - it is not as simple as that in practice.
Journalists need to make a judgement call on what arguments are "credible". Otherwise you end up giving the same weightage to Nazis as to the Holocaust survivors. When journalists start doing that - we get Trump (and Putin and Modi et al).
The problem is doubly evident in niche areas like Tesla. Journalists just don't have the basic knowledge necessary to make good judgements. They tend to just repeat what they heard or read. So depending on the "conventional wisdom" - the narrative takes on a negative bent (when positive arguments no longer "feel" credible to a journalist) and the other way round too.
It really isn't that hard to avoid the gross errors made by "journalists". Maybe I'm showing too many grey hairs. Maybe I've got rose-tinted glasses for the "good old days." But I remember a time when there were standards in writing.
It didn't stop yellow journalism, but there wasn't this notion that "critical thinking is just too hard so its not their fault they get it wrong all the time."