Tslynk67
Well-Known Member
Good, or bad, or both...?
Looks like Fred's pissed Elon off big-time...
Looks like Fred's pissed Elon off big-time...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, gotcha seemed like a real analysis/ view, but if it was just a worst case spitballing/ value prediction, that still makes Tesla look good, I'm all for it! (I've been dinged on overly pessimistic base assumption that still may a great case for Tesla also).
Reign it in their soldier. The sequoia can only grow so fast.
Rons price target is 20 times $300 = $ 6,000
Larry has the reputation of being a loose cannon. Infact the saying among Oracle employees was that whenever he opened his mouth the Oracle SP would drop. But Larry would probably be better than many non-tech CEOs mentioned here (like that Murdoch guy).Seen a lot names thrown around fo chairman. Larry Ellison is the first serious one I would consider in my opinion.
Funny thing is he didn't completely believe in internet. Marc Benioff, who worked at Oracle at the time, first pitched his idea about a hosted CRM service to Larry but Larry wasn't interested. Marc went out of Oracle and started Salesforce. Today Salesforce market cap is about 2/3rds of Oracle's.Remember him in mid nineties saying pcs were history and trying to pitch cheap keyboard computer that would be all about the internet. It failed miserably but he was right.
TA is not magic and it won’t predict everything, but it’s an extremely powerful tool if you know how and when to use it.
I have always thought that technical analysis was BS, but experience has completely changed my mind.
You will find the answer to your questions in any serious book about trading.
Just look at option sniper on Twitter. He has an unbelievable success rate using pure TA.
Wasn't there a guy who used his free supercharging to mine bitcoin? lol
sounds like a good idea to me. Did you run it by Fred?So, what I wrote back in 2014 was this.
* Any time Tesla adds significant new features, they need to raise the price of the car with the new features.
* Ideally, the new features will be added as options. If they have to physically include them on all cars, they can software-lock cars which are going to people who don't buy the option.
* After a month or two, they can discontinue the model without the new features, making it standard, but at the higher price.
* A month after, they can reduce the price of the car with the new feature somewhat, honoring the price reduction for anyone who hasn't received their car yet.
* They can walk the price down a step at a time until it reaches the original price (or not, depending on pricing policy).
* They can also offer software unlocks for the same price as the option, and also walk that price down.
* About a year later, they can software-unlock the software-locked models at no charge without people being particularly upset.
Final result is that you have the new feature on all cars at the original price, but nobody is annoyed.
Rinse and repeat with every significant hardware feature. Nobody will complain.
LOL!
Thank you for that. But I've gotta say - you aren't going to make a lot of friends in *this* forum.
Sorry to ruin your analogy, but sequoias are actually rather fast-growing trees In good conditions they'll grow over a meter per year, for decades. And a mature sequoia will put on the mass of a 15-meter tall / 30cm diameter tree every year.
Maybe you meant "The saguaro can only grow so fast"
Yep. I've driven about 20000 miles per year over the past 5+ years. About 6500 miles a year include round trips to and from Columbia, MO and to and from Desert Hot Springs, CA. I usually do other smaller trips for an additional 1000 miles a year. For me, it's no so much about the cost as about the convenience.Average driving 4000 miles a year on trips is not the average. Average 20000 miles a year is 5000 over average of all drivers average. I wont ask your opinion on average penis size
Not relevant actually. The refund of the $5K to the car still makes it worth less. I am willing to bet that the seller, if they got the refund, would still try to sell the car for the same price as those who did not. Transferable or not. The car was purchased for 5K less. In my mind it is worth 5K less.No Model 3 ever has supercharging stay with the car when transferred.
I’m an economist and wouldn’t make a rookie mistake like not factoring in the transferability of super charging into any cost analysis calculations.
Though transferable supercharging would appease people overnight....
Hey I was the first one here to point out you deserved credit... where's my cookie.
I'm under no delusion that Fred is a reporter or Electrek is a news site.
Fred is arguably Tesla's #1 evangelist and Electrek is what it is mainly because Tesla leaks info to them. They have access nobody else does.
So I find it a bit humorous when the the top writer for Tesla's de-facto propaganda department gets in a huff because Tesla made a change and he didn't get advance notice.
My dog will bark at my wife when she want's food because she knows my wife will give it to her. For me she waits patiently by her bowl because she knows that behavior will get her nowhere.
I'm really surprised Elon hasn't put Fred in his place.