Here it isI look forward to watching the crash test videos for that vehicle.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here it isI look forward to watching the crash test videos for that vehicle.
Indeed! Ark Invest's $1400/share thesis totally ignores Tesla Energy, which is a much more certain to pay out over the next 5 years vs wide-spread autonomous vehicles.Thanks for sharing this really fine analysis. Reminds me that I must increase my investment in Tesla this week. I remember the era of Apple naysayers all too well. Wish I had the funds to invest in Apple when it was $13 a share. Live and hopefully learn.
ho lee fak! why did it explode? was not expecting that! So, lithium? /SHere it is View attachment 351740
+#540/year for the battery.Well no, it's simply not practical. It (the Twizy) is one of the cheapest EVs here in the UK. In fact one of the cheapest 4-wheeled vehicles in the UK to buy new. It costs under £7000 (+ battery hire). It isn't a price issue with that one. It has very little storage or passenger space, has a very limited range, limited top speed and has salon-style doors at the sides without a stock option for windows. You're completely exposed to the elements. (edit: apparently you can get zip-on Windows. Nice). The fact it looks goofy is just a side-effect. Honestly, if people aren't so bothered about looks then they're at least bothered by practicality. These vehicles offer neither in my opinion and that's why very few people are driving them.
They remind me of this:
Here it is View attachment 351740
ho lee fak! why did it explode? was not expecting that! So, lithium? /S
BTW, the orgininal GIF was STOLEN offen DARWIN-AWARDS.TV
Cheers!
I'm wholly unsurprised. My test drive was enough to 100% hook me.Tesla has a 97% nps score. Thats incredible!
Tesla Motors | NPS Benchmarks
Net Promoter Score®, or NPS® is a loyalty metric developed by Fred Reichheld and was introduced by him in his 2003 Harvard Business Review article "The One Number You Need to Grow". At its core, NPS can be termed as a metric that measures a customer’s willingness to recommend a brand’s product and services to their friends, family and colleagues.
I actually love the office chairs in there, looks comfy. Wonder why we did not see them on production cars already.At $23,000 I was expecting...well...doors for starters, seriously!
15KWH battery, 82 horses, 100mi. range, 0-62 mi. in 13 seconds.
Sorry, there is nothing cool about this EV.
Now let's see what VW can do for $23,000.
View attachment 351603
As a comparison:Tesla has a 97% nps score. Thats incredible!
Tesla Motors | NPS Benchmarks
Net Promoter Score®, or NPS® is a loyalty metric developed by Fred Reichheld and was introduced by him in his 2003 Harvard Business Review article "The One Number You Need to Grow". At its core, NPS can be termed as a metric that measures a customer’s willingness to recommend a brand’s product and services to their friends, family and colleagues.
Tesla has a 97% nps score. Thats incredible!
Tesla Motors | NPS Benchmarks
Net Promoter Score®, or NPS® is a loyalty metric developed by Fred Reichheld and was introduced by him in his 2003 Harvard Business Review article "The One Number You Need to Grow". At its core, NPS can be termed as a metric that measures a customer’s willingness to recommend a brand’s product and services to their friends, family and colleagues.
The score was last updated in 2014. Perhaps it doesn't matter and the value would be similar today, but the company has grown a lot since then. I suppose many here would say it has only gotten better since then?
This isn't political -- it's pre-political. I am making an argument over economic facts. If someone wants to argue that we should have stock speculators pay lower taxes than working people, that is a political argument, and I've been trying to avoid that argument.
We've got someone here who is flat-out lying about the actual current situation -- the current situation being that stock speculators do pay lower taxes than working people, and this means the ultra-rich pay lower tax rates than the mere 1%ers. I don't like seeing propagandistic lies repeated unchallenged.
Hearing stock speculators referred to as "earners" is like hearing short-sellers referred to as "investors". Sorry, it really ticks me off. Even though I'm a stock speculator.
Agreed. It is ridiculous whenever someone says Tesla will have a problem with demand. Anyone who has owned (and likely almost anyone who has driven) a Tesla could not claim that without being intentionally dishonest. It just so obvious they make the best car in the world BY FAR!After I put my reservation in for a Model 3 I wasn't even considering a different new vehicle.
Now that I've had it for 4 months, I honestly don't know what the heck I would do if I couldn't get another one someday!
Yes. I wasn't even thinking about buying a new car when I took a test drive and ordered the same day. Every time I drive the car, I have a big smile and think this is the best car in the world. Nothing else even comes close. Four years now and it never gets old.Agreed. It is ridiculous whenever someone says Tesla will have a problem with demand. Anyone who has owned (and likely almost anyone who has driven) a Tesla could not claim that without being intentionally dishonest. It just so obvious they make the best car in the world BY FAR!
I think that says more about you than it does them.
The problem with the Twizy is price.
The problem with the Biomega concept is price.
The problem with Think! was price.
People keep trying and they'll keep failing.
The similarities between Tesla and Apple more and more obvious:
Vertical
integration similarities (Source: ARK Investment Management)
Tesla — "Apple Of Cars" — Entering Its Golden Age | CleanTechnica
Tesla Through the Lens of Apple - ARK Investment Management
ARK invest made some very valid and strong points and I like them pointing out that Apple was as Tesla near bankruptcy too.
Also it needs to be pointed out as you see in the graph that Apple did and does contract manufacturing only whereby Tesla has its own facilities build for good reasons. One reason is there was no other choice for Tesla.
The cost to build those plants have created the $12bn long term debt that are often criticized. IOW the debt is invested CapEx you don't have to pay any more for unlike Apple pays for contract manufacturing every single day. That will help with margin and profits more than it does for Apple where this is a longterm running cost element.
The caveat is the cost of debt or tied up capital interest of Tesla that weight on the balance sheet but this is looking at the tremendous cash Tesla will produce from now on every quarter no issue and a rather short term challenge even with new GFs to be build.
I could not agree more to the analogy and the bright future ahead for Tesla.