-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
BozieBeMe2
May I have this dance?
It's kinda like that parody site about Mark B. Spiegel
@markbspeigel, you really strain to see what the joke was
Oh, it's been made
Elon said so
. It's due to entire supply chain and manufacturing line being setup for ~100-120k/yr.One remote but possible option is that they could setup a new S/X line overseas with updated design, then back import to the US and reallocate Fremont to more 3s/Ys... Not great for US pricing, but keeps the supply continuous. Could also do that with GF1, but is US/Canada/Mexico demand sufficient to support it?
Resource wise, they'll probably keep S/X as is and grow in the 3,Y, Pickup, Semi, Roadster spaces...
Fun article from Chuck Jones at Forbes. Headline pretty much sums it up: Musk's Flamethrower Warning Would Have Saved The Shorts Over $2.8 Billion
But these are also nice:
Jones notes that there has not been much covering yet, despite the losses. Which leads to this: "Tesla shorts are a hardy bunch (or do they just not get it?)"
But these are also nice:
"In just two weeks the shorts have “lost” over $2.8 billion
For the first 15 days of June Tesla’s shares have taken off rising to close at $358.17, up 26%, on Friday. Dusaniwsky calculates that through this past Tuesday, June 12, the shorts were down $2.3 billion .
I’ve utilized his analysis to apply it to the last three days of this week, which includes Thursday’s $13 gain. Over these three sessions, the shorts lost, on paper, about $600 million, for a total of over $2.8 billion."
I’ve utilized his analysis to apply it to the last three days of this week, which includes Thursday’s $13 gain. Over these three sessions, the shorts lost, on paper, about $600 million, for a total of over $2.8 billion."
Last edited:
BozieBeMe2
May I have this dance?
Brings to mind the old quip, You need to stand for something or fall for everything.Fun article from Chuck Jones at Forbes. Headline pretty much sums it up: Musk's Flamethrower Warning Would Have Saved The Shorts Over $2.8 Billion
But these are also nice:
Which leads to this: "Tesla shorts are a hardy bunch (or do they just not get it?)""In just two weeks the shorts have “lost” over $2.8 billion
For the first 15 days of June Tesla’s shares have taken off rising to close at $358.17, up 26%, on Friday. Dusaniwsky calculates that through this past Tuesday, June 12, the shorts were down $2.3 billion .
I’ve utilized his analysis to apply it to the last three days of this week, which includes Thursday’s $13 gain. Over these three sessions, the shorts lost, on paper, about $600 million, for a total of over $2.8 billion."
In this case, it's easier and sometimes cheaper to tear down than to build.
Look at these individuals and ask them 'just what have you accomplished today, besides making a fool out of yourself'.
Paracelsus
Active Member
As Sam Rayburn often said - "Any jackass can kick down a barn, but it takes a good carpenter to build one."
And only one idiot with not a flamethrower to burn it down...
joeinslw
Member
meehh Result is what the Short Sellers want, they are trying to push it over a cliff, so there shorts will do well, but that smells instead
I have been following and investing in tsla since 2012, every time we hear something bad about tsla, the opposite happens, the stock goes up.
Those of you who believe in Tesla, their ideas, their technology should invest in tsla, wait, and hold.
Just the other day I read that if someone invested $1,000.00 in tsla March of 2010 your investment would be worth 1,000% more today. That should be enough for anyone, just look at all the infrastructure that cost millions, do you think they are building that for nothing?
Think about it.
Dennisj00
Member
Unfortunately many of us can’t go back to 2010, but an average price of $250 looks really good!
sweter
Member
So why 3 weeks? Isn’t Q2 delivery numbers to be released in about 2 weeks? Or is 3 weeks the China factory announcement?
Oooohh, burn!
skitown
Member
Or maybe Q2 deliveries will underwhelm, but by 3 weeks it will be obvious what their go-forward run-rate will be. That's been my assumption.
sweter
Member
"Maybe 3 weeks, 6 definitely". Elon-time.
BUT, and I may be overreaching and overhyping here, I'm a bit suspicious about this time frame and P3 being produced vs the leaked email from before. At current 3.5k/wk Elon is way too confident that they will hit 5k in 2 weeks. This is a huge increase.
I wonder if the "leaked" email is a more elaborate play and they are much farther along.
BUT, and I may be overreaching and overhyping here, I'm a bit suspicious about this time frame and P3 being produced vs the leaked email from before. At current 3.5k/wk Elon is way too confident that they will hit 5k in 2 weeks. This is a huge increase.
I wonder if the "leaked" email is a more elaborate play and they are much farther along.
Perhaps delivery numbers will be released a day or two after the 4th of July.
mickificki
Member
Or something else?
It is getting harder and harder not to get excited about this
With this comment Elon had better deliver.
Love the guy and everything he and tesla stands for, but if the result is underwhelming in three weeks time no telling what will happen to tsla.
Causalien
Prime 8 ball Oracle
Consider the tax hits.
Maybe 25% per year while the rest is on mortgage is better. Use an excel spread sheet and see which one sees you come out ahead tax wise.
I think that would be market manipulation in the view of the SEC.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Poll
