2
22522
Guest
I think Elon's sharing on twitter keeps things transparent and above board.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that would be market manipulation in the view of the SEC.
Right. A plan to deal with catastrophe situations. Initially I only sold puts covered by cash. Then I realized I could sell them against my margin capacity without paying interest, but I'm still only selling them against the margin capacity provided by *stocks which aren't Tesla*, and I'm using only about half of *that* capacity, so that if those stocks drop by 50%, *and* Tesla dips so that all my puts get executed, I can have them executed without borrowing money at all.
The curious interest rate structure for margin (lower rates on larger loans) encourages this. My principle is to never pay interest, however.
The SEC already ruled, some years ago, that Twitter was sufficiently wide distribution that it couldn't be considered market manipulation. Elon Musk created nearly $1B in value today with a single tweet (article from 2015, referring to a ruling from 2013).I think that would be market manipulation in the view of the SEC.
I agree. I meant writing a false email intended to be leaked (which I don't think happened) would be market manipulation.The SEC already ruled, some years ago, that Twitter was sufficiently wide distribution that it couldn't be considered market manipulation. Elon Musk created nearly $1B in value today with a single tweet (article from 2015, referring to a ruling from 2013).
Perhaps delivery numbers will be released a day or two after the 4th of July.
Welcome. Hope you are just a paid FUD man vs actually have a Short in tesla. Enjoy the nuanced nature of your posts. Exquisite.I agree. I meant writing a false email intended to be leaked (which I don't think happened) would be market manipulation.
I agree. I meant writing a false email intended to be leaked (which I don't think happened) would be market manipulation.
Perhaps delivery numbers will be released a day or two after the 4th of July.
I agree. I meant writing a false email intended to be leaked (which I don't think happened) would be market manipulation.
I have a buy order in for Monday @350...think the MMD will get that low?
Actually, you're on to something, they'll probably be announced after the market closes on 7/3, so when the market opens in the US on 7/5, that will be the day of explosion.
Boom boom, out go the shorts!
I get what you're saying and there is truth in your words.I think that would be market manipulation in the view of the SEC.
Agree with most of this - I was just disagreeing with someone up-thread who thought the email was a "play".I get what you're saying and there is truth in your words.
But think about context of this situation. If Elon hits the milestone (I doubt it) or overdeliver, you would need to argue: Elon needed to be more consistently optimistic. He wrote email where he used words: "radical change" and this was pessimistic and misleading.
Elon? Needs to be more optimistic? I'd like to see anyone being able to pin it on Elon...
So whether Elon is trying to play the game (I doubt it) or not, he's in position where he can actually, and safely do it. Part of that is his own weakness, no one trusts his optimism anymore, so it's enough to dial it down a notch, and bam, there is a bear trap (as bears interpret it according to their wishful thinking). Perhaps you should consider this risk, however small, in your thesis.
For the record, (as opposed to many members of this forum,) I don't think Elon spends time daydreaming traps for shorts. I think he's too busy with the real stuff, building cars and rockets, doing AI and tunnels, being a good dad and chasing eligible young starlets.
Oooohh, burn!