Thumper
Active Member
It seems to me that planes should be, and should have been, using some sort of Linear induction motor/aircraft carrier-esque take off system. Use electricity to get the whole aircraft off the ground at least.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So my father - Tesla FUD victim and huge huge Model S/X critic - checked out the Model 3 today and well, it's his new dream car now. He'll order a Lemur after a testdrive. Daaaaaamn.
Ordered a LR RWD Model 3 today as those who cancelled are now allowed to re-order and receive the 14k rebate. (can't order anything else)
Now to see if there are any R3's left around. If not, will have to settle for X-Ice I guess.
I'm attorney general Whitaker I would like to help you market that time machine
Yup. at least put Tesla drive units in the wheel trucks. That way planes could taxi or hold on the ground w/o wasting jet fuel, plus the take-off roll would be much shorter.It seems to me that planes should be, and should have been, using some sort of Linear induction motor/aircraft carrier-esque take off system. Use electricity to get the whole aircraft off the ground at least.
I admit that a full screen capture image, even when viewed on one of largest cell phones, is darn near illegible.Ah, so you admit the real pricing is hidden in fine print!
Ok, that is my bad, once I had placed the 3 images (first from mobile, 2nd and 3rd from desktop) on the post, I lacked a keyboard to seperate and annotate them, and was running late for Turkey prep. I figured the takeaway of each instance if a price being coupled to an explanation of the credits, or the non credit version was sufficient support that Tesla was not hiding anything.You moved the real pricing to the top, the opposite of how they are really shown, on the bottom of the page
Distracted from the real price. The theoretical "savings" are just that, theoretical. Why lead with something which may not be accurate depending on circumstance? If my previous vehicle was a LEAF or electric skateboard or something there are no fuel savings.
Yeah and I read over on Reeking Alpha that a Toyota was cheaper to run than a model 3.
Agreed. In support of your thesis, also important to think about difference between gross margin and marginal cost to produce one more car. Gross margin includes in the cost not only direct costs, but some non-cash items like depreciations. So any additional car that can be produced and sold is contributing to the cash more than just a gross margin; in the case of S and X it maybe as much as 50%, if sold at full price.Makes sense in a way. China did $400M turnover or some 3500's S/X last quarter. That's worth protecting. Especially because a few key other key markets may be less likely to absorb those cars due to changing regulations (thinking mainly about the US and the Netherlands here). Due to healthy margins the hit on the bottom line won't be too severe and in light of the GF3 deal it's probably best to show that local market a bit of extra special love.
In support of your thesis, also important to think about difference between gross margin and marginal cost to produce one more car.
Let's get some music up in this place! I dunno, maybe oh, some STARSHIP?
Starship - We Built This City
Down 23% with no explenation... Ah want to see a picture of the tea leaves you are reading.Seems like the next few weeks won't be that nice... Nasdaq might fall further from 6'500 level to 5'000... might drag TSLA along... Kinda afraid of this scenario.