Hi folks
I'm pretty new to all the EV things as I own my SR+ for only four months. I was since bothered by the car not reaching its EPA range. I understood that no car can reach its EPA rated range in real life, but I didn't expect they can be off by that much (one extreme example is that 17km of driving cost me over 53km of range). Instead of close my eyes and switch the display to %, I decided to read and record my own numbers. First post I have related to this topic is Overall M3+ Efficiency w/ Detailed Data. I got a lot of help, especially from @AlanSubie4Life and @darth_vad3r, in that thread. After that, I realized that measure the loss over the rated range as vampire drain is not scientific. Vampire drain strictly speaking is the drain while not driving. Since it's not driving, you can't measure that by distance or range.
Recently, I started a new method, not new to a lot of members here, of recording to determine the drain. I recorded a lot of numbers, even switch between % and kms, to minimize the error. As a side product of this method, I found a simple way to determine the vampire drain. Here's how: charge your car to a certain percentage every time, read out the difference between the kWh used from last charging and kWh Added, that's the vampire drain in between your two charges.
For the pic below, I charged my car two days ago to 80% SoC. I drove 140.4km and used 21kWh of power. Theoretically if no vampire drain, I would have added 21kWh juice to top up to the same 80% SoC. However, added kWh suggested that I used 27kWh. That difference of 27kWh - 21kWh = 6kWh is the vampire drain for that two days.
It's not the most accurate way of doing it, but simple enough to understand and measure. Thoughts and recommendations?
Thanks!
I'm pretty new to all the EV things as I own my SR+ for only four months. I was since bothered by the car not reaching its EPA range. I understood that no car can reach its EPA rated range in real life, but I didn't expect they can be off by that much (one extreme example is that 17km of driving cost me over 53km of range). Instead of close my eyes and switch the display to %, I decided to read and record my own numbers. First post I have related to this topic is Overall M3+ Efficiency w/ Detailed Data. I got a lot of help, especially from @AlanSubie4Life and @darth_vad3r, in that thread. After that, I realized that measure the loss over the rated range as vampire drain is not scientific. Vampire drain strictly speaking is the drain while not driving. Since it's not driving, you can't measure that by distance or range.
Recently, I started a new method, not new to a lot of members here, of recording to determine the drain. I recorded a lot of numbers, even switch between % and kms, to minimize the error. As a side product of this method, I found a simple way to determine the vampire drain. Here's how: charge your car to a certain percentage every time, read out the difference between the kWh used from last charging and kWh Added, that's the vampire drain in between your two charges.
For the pic below, I charged my car two days ago to 80% SoC. I drove 140.4km and used 21kWh of power. Theoretically if no vampire drain, I would have added 21kWh juice to top up to the same 80% SoC. However, added kWh suggested that I used 27kWh. That difference of 27kWh - 21kWh = 6kWh is the vampire drain for that two days.
It's not the most accurate way of doing it, but simple enough to understand and measure. Thoughts and recommendations?
Thanks!