jhm
Well-Known Member
Let me get this straight: Tesla's H1 sales of Models S & X are up 53% y/y, while US auto sales are down, -2.1% for the same period. But Tesla is the one with a plateau problem?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that part of the issue is sector rotation out of the qqq.At least I could figure out what the market was reacting to with the SolarCity news. This is just *nonsense*. (like the Feburary 2016 dip)
Better than expected Model 3 production rate; S & X production at the high end of guidance, deliveries at the low end but within guidance; NASDAQ doing OK; other carmakers doing jack and *sugar*... Sure, Tesla got an imperfect IIHS score, but this is simply silly. It has to be supply and demand. Someone is unloading shares.
Great move!I converted a portion of my holdings to LEAPs. The valuation does not reflect the upcoming 3x growth next year.
Let me get this straight: Tesla's H1 sales of Models S & X are up 53% y/y, while US auto sales are down, -2.1% for the same period. But Tesla is the one with a plateau problem?
They have to have some cultish motivation
Pendulum swung the other way. Momentum traders were helping us up, now they are dragging us down...At least I could figure out what the market was reacting to with the SolarCity news. This is just *nonsense*. (like the Feburary 2016 dip)
Better than expected Model 3 production rate; S & X production at the high end of guidance, deliveries at the low end but within guidance; NASDAQ doing OK; other carmakers doing jack and *sugar*... Sure, Tesla got an imperfect IIHS score, but this is simply silly. It has to be supply and demand. Someone is unloading shares.
Geez, I wonder if this limit of 25K/quarter for demand has anything to do with the limit of 25k/quarter of S+X production that Elon discussed on the Q1 call? The S+X production line is limited to about 100K per year. Tesla tweaks product capability, incentives, product availability (inventory vs. custom build) etc. to match demand to that level of production. And it doesn't currently make financial sense to invest capital in increasing S+X production (and demand). It's that simple.This is the first true indication of the demand ceiling on the S&X (cap at 22-25k/quarter).
Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla Motors, Inc.
Well, I think, we feel pretty good about achieving the sort of the 100K – roughly 100K total for the year for Model S and Model X, combined. That's where we kind of want to be. The manufacturing system and the supply chain is all sort of set up for that level. We continue to be surprised by how sort of frankly naïve people are – a lot of people are about production and supply chain. It's as though there is some like easy way to increase production. It's truly not. Any given production system, you design it for optimal output and then you aim to improve efficiency, reliability, quality, and so forth at that output. But the Model S and Model X system as we said last year, was designed for 100,000 units, and now initially to get to that rate, we have to use a lot of overtime, a lot of expediting, and that affected our gross margin on the car. And now we're sort of at steady state with kind of the top part of that S-curve that we're targeting. And so now focus for Model S and Model X is improving production efficiency, continuing to improve quality and...
...Yeah, and internal costs and so forth to sort of and to get the automotive gross margin of Model S and Model X to the 30% level that we've been aspiring to for a while.
Because the production line maxes out right around 100k. Even if there was demand for 200k, Tesla wouldn't be able to build them.
I'm surprised people keep discussing all this other stuff and are forgetting the tesla imposed supply constraint.
Perhaps after model 3 they will add or update lines, but the plan has been to Max at 100k for several years now and focus on model 3.
Oil surging. EIA just announced a very large total oil (crude + product) draw.
The statement was about demand, not productions capacity. More production capacity can be built if the demand is there.
Not so fast. An extra 18 million barrels just rolled into retail channels. US domestic consumption is up 13% in one week, REALLY??? Nah, that 13.4 million barrel draw is little more than channel stuffing. This is an illusion for the unwary.
Shorting Oil, Hedging Tesla
There are always multiple facets to a story, and you can thoroughly expect that unless extreme efforts are made to be impartial, only one facet will ever be presented by any party, even/especially news agencies. Not to get too far OT, but that's one of the reasons why politics have become so very polarizing of late, because people can get their confirmation biased news from whatever source they want without exposure to any opposing views. In the case of the financial markets, there are billions and trillions of dollars at stake, so in no way to I expect any news source that accepts advertising to be unbiased from what their masters tell them. As with all things, follow the money, and the money wants Tesla to fail.Let me get this straight: Tesla's H1 sales of Models S & X are up 53% y/y, while US auto sales are down, -2.1% for the same period. But Tesla is the one with a plateau problem?
Good point. Meanwhile, the advertising lever is still available to be pulled. Here in Chicagoland there remains a huge number of potential buyers minimally aware of Tesla or electric cars in general. A significant number still have not even heard of Tesla and its cars. Only a minority of people follow the financial news. Of course once the Model 3's are in customers' hands, word-of-mouth advertising should pick up quite significantly.