bdy0627
Active Member
The interesting thing is that Musk has stated that "a win should feel like a win." Jobs nailed that almost every time by generally keeping expectations at a vague and mysterious level until his product reveals. The public knew something special was coming but didn't know the details. Musk has tried to deliver that but because he simply can't keep himself from intentionally creating virtually impossible expectations, particularly with timelines, a win rarely feels like a win. The market has often responded to his expectations at first, with the stock rising only to fall once reality sets in. It's almost a mirror image of what Musk's own perception must be. He probably initially believes his timelines and then later realizes they were simply not possible from the getgo. That's actually part of his appeal. He is manipulative in a seemingly-innocent way vs Jobs' sophisticated approach.You're conflating two disparate styles of management and leadership- albeit both successful. The difference is public exposure of the goal (Elon) vs reveal only at completion of the goal (Jobs). There wasn't a single Apple product completed on time, but the public and investors weren't allowed participation in that disclosure.
Musk (uniquely) operates differently. He hasn't exceeded expectations because they WERE divulged prior to accomplishment.
When did any Apple expectation reveal such from a Jobs declaration? Never- but internally, they NEVER exceeded those same expectations. That was precisely the strategic deployment required to develop the moat for the markets they were addressing.
This is not the case for Tesla and Elon knows it and has always known it. Tesla is most (and only) successful if they disrupt and catalyze the entire transportation, energy, and manufacturing industries of the world.
The two men are different leaders against different objectives with different methods of achievement.