You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The battery day presentation showed a graph with the charging speed of 4680 tabbed and tabless v 2170 (I think), and they showed that tabless was needed to just about match 2170 charging.Plaid (2s 0-60) uses 18650 cells. These new 18650 cells seem to charge a lot faster than the current 2170s, as well.
I think the 4680s are primarily geared towards increasing range and simplifying manufacturing, but all cells/packs will get better over time. EVs suffer from heavy battery packs so a lighter pack with same 82 kWh capacity should reduce 0-60 times a bit.
Interested in source of the rumors. Elon did say many years ago that ludicrous mode or something similar was coming.There have been some rumors going around about an improved performance model. It seems inevitable... eventually. I wouldn't bet on it necessarily being tied directly to 4680, though.
LMFTFY: If you don't already have a Tesla on order, you WILL have to have to awhile moreSo if you dont already have a Tesla you should wait a while more? ;-)
This article covers it pretty well: Tesla source code hints new versions of the Performance Model 3/Y may be coming soon [Update]Interested in source of the rumors. Elon did say many years ago that ludicrous mode or something similar was coming.
If this is a new mode for existing priced cars, then its intriguing. But having a higher priced P and LR seems like a non-starter, they're already at the upper edge of the value equation IMO.This article covers it pretty well: Tesla source code hints new versions of the Performance Model 3/Y may be coming soon [Update]
The basis is really tiny, though, so it could mean almost anything at this point.
Not sure about that, I think a v2 MYP or M3P with increased range closer to 375 with a bump in 0-60 and quarter mile times and air suspension would be something I would go for, even if priced in mid 75-85 without FSD.If this is a new mode for existing priced cars, then its intriguing. But having a higher priced P and LR seems like a non-starter, they're already at the upper edge of the value equation IMO.
My guess was that it would replace the p in the lineup, but really its impossible to know right now. Tesla tend to favor fewer trims, though.If this is a new mode for existing priced cars, then its intriguing. But having a higher priced P and LR seems like a non-starter, they're already at the upper edge of the value equation IMO.
Seems highly improbable they'd bump the range, acceleration boost is likely doable with software on the MYP as it already has a motor improvement over the YLR, no disagreement on suspension.Not sure about that, I think a v2 MYP or M3P with increased range closer to 375 with a bump in 0-60 and quarter mile times and air suspension would be something I would go for, even if priced in mid 75-85 without FSD.
True, its just speculation of course.My guess was that it would replace the p in the lineup, but really its impossible to know right now. Tesla tend to favor fewer trims, though.
And structural rigidity....4680 is all about cost savings… for Tesla. Any additional benefits consider it a perk.
There was mention of a MYPV2 a while back in September, speculation with carbon wrapped motors to increase quarter mile specs.True, its just speculation of course.
My thought process is given the low ratio of Performance to Y in the registry here, I don't believe there is a large enough addressable market to support a "Super MYP" . Personally I'd just go up to the S or even the X if a MYP didn't tick all the boxes for me.