You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great comment overall, but I had to laugh at this part remembering the garbage companies that "passed muster" and did traditional IPOs at the tail end of the dotcom bubble.You've just described pretty much every SPAC, and I'm not joking.
...... Every single SPAC merger candidate I've seen was not ready to be public and wouldn't have passed muster in a traditional IPO.
So here's the deal with early Tesla versus Lucid. Early Tesla was selling cars mostly to techies here in California. Lucid is marketing "true luxury" to Saudi royals. You can see how the bug threshold is going to be a lot different.
The decision on when to ship a product is a business decision, not a technical decision. It's impossible to fix all the bugs and ship in a reasonable timeframe. It's a question of how many bugs are ok.
This article seems to imply investors simply don't understand SPACs enough, but that investors should very happy with CCIV. I see no clarifying details at all.I find this Lucid's confusing road to going public describe the
I think it is tough to build a factory outside of Detroit. I believe that the Lordstown, Rivian getting some help from Detroit automakers go along way and will be deliver ahead of Lucid. Fisker do not even try. It is hard to do what Tesla does.Do you think the delay in initial deliveries will be me with suspicion for further delays?
Lucid plans to use the parts and supply infrastructure that has built up in northern Mexico the past couple decades. Peter Hochholdinger started up the Audi plant in San José Chiapa before joining Tesla, so he presumably knows about sourcing parts in Mexico. Though the Audi plant isn't in the north, and is actually almost as far from Arizona as Detroit.I think it is tough to build a factory outside of Detroit. I believe that the Lordstown, Rivian getting some help from Detroit automakers go along way and will be deliver ahead of Lucid. Fisker do not even try. It is hard to do what Tesla does.
What surprised me a bit is Lucid won't stamp their own body panels to start out. I don't know who does that for them.
Tesla's arrangement of stamping on-site is actually unusual, inherited from NUMMI, at least according to the tour guide at the Fremont plant. Most traditional automaker assembly plants don't have on-site stamping.
I assume that building own stamping is capital intensive for low volume manufacturing. Probably wise for them to invest in stamping at a later date or for higher volume vehicle.Tesla's arrangement of stamping on-site is actually unusual, inherited from NUMMI, at least according to the tour guide at the Fremont plant. Most traditional automaker assembly plants don't have on-site stamping.
Anyone know when the official merger date is ?
and what the new ticker for CCIV will be ?
LUCD would be ideal.
I assume that building own stamping is capital intensive for low volume manufacturing. Probably wise for them to invest in stamping at a later date or for higher volume vehicle.