There have been multiple reports of SR+ now recording 0-60 times of ~4.99s while the LR RWD is only ~4.9s and LR AWD is 4.0s in real world tests.
Why is the gap between standard range and long range RWD so little? It feels like it should be closer to 4.5s to bridge the gap between it and LR AWD. It could be a traction issue for the RWD models but I don’t understand why the SR+ has been improved by ~0.3s from its advertised numbers while LR RWD is down only ~0.1s and LR AWD is down ~0.4s.
Why is the gap between standard range and long range RWD so little? It feels like it should be closer to 4.5s to bridge the gap between it and LR AWD. It could be a traction issue for the RWD models but I don’t understand why the SR+ has been improved by ~0.3s from its advertised numbers while LR RWD is down only ~0.1s and LR AWD is down ~0.4s.