nwdiver
Well-Known Member
I have no friggin' clue what you are trying to demonstrate with that contraption,
Wow.... you really do have a 15 minute memory. Apologies. Is this new or have you been living like this for years?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no friggin' clue what you are trying to demonstrate with that contraption,
I have no friggin' clue what you are trying to demonstrate with that contraption, and how that applies to the atmosphere. If you truly want to learn something about the Annual Global Budget of the atmosphere, you would listen to the late, great Dr. William Gray. He spent his entire life studying the atmosphere, The entire lecture is worth watching. To shorten things, go to 7:30. There he talks about where CO2 fits in. This guy knew by far more what goes on in the atmosphere than some Pac NW engineer.
At 17:30, Gray explains why the water vapor feedback does not work in the climate models. Subsidence from cumulonimbus clouds dries the upper atmosphere.I have no friggin' clue what you are trying to demonstrate with that contraption, and how that applies to the atmosphere. If you truly want to learn something about the Annual Global Budget of the atmosphere, you would listen to the late, great Dr. William Gray. He spent his entire life studying the atmosphere, The entire lecture is worth watching. To shorten things, go to 7:30. There he talks about where CO2 fits in. This guy knew by far more what goes on in the atmosphere than some Pac NW engineer.
After the cumulonimbus clouds reach dissipation stage, upper tropospheric subsidence results in a drying factor that the climate models neglect.According to him we can't make any long term predictions at all because it is too complex, and climate models are like some strange animal to him. Maybe "atmospheric" scientists are better at predicting the weather...
There will be less water vapor because there will be more water vapor causing rain? I don't know who that makes sense to, but not to me. To me that sounds like story telling time for small children. And like a weather guy trying to talk about climate.
After the cumulonimbus clouds reach dissipation stage, upper tropospheric subsidence results in a drying factor that the climate models neglect.
Also, note how the climate predictors do not want to make 1 year, 3 year, or 5 year predictions. Why? Because they can be verified! So, they go out to 50 years, 75 years, 100 years because everybody will be dead before they can be verified.
Why is it any concern of yours how I've lived? I'm retired. 4 years of Trump doubled my 401K so I could retire a few years early.Wow.... you really do have a 15 minute memory. Apologies. Is this new or have you been living like this for years?
Tyndall's climate message, 150 years on
The people living today Einstein.Everyone will be dead because of global warming in less than 100 years? Wow your outlook is even more pessimistic.
Why is it any concern of yours how I've lived? I'm retired. 4 years of Trump doubled my 401K so I could retire a few years early.
The people living today Einstein.
I have kids and grandkids. I am doing all I can to protect them from the likes of you.Yep, just like the SNL skit on the evil boomers who only care about themselves, screw the kids. LOL
After the cumulonimbus clouds reach dissipation stage, upper tropospheric subsidence results in a drying factor that the climate models neglect.
Also, note how the climate predictors do not want to make 1 year, 3 year, or 5 year predictions. Why? Because they can be verified! So, they go out to 50 years, 75 years, 100 years because everybody will be dead before they can be verified.
My perspective on global warming is due to paying attention to Lindzen, Christy, Curry, Spencer, Gray, Michaels, Legates, Nir Shaviv, Koonin, Happer, Dyson, and others.Well, that explains your perspective on whether global warming is a problem or not
Actually, nobody understands the basics of climate. If they did, then they would be able to predict it. Nobody can.No, obviously because those are noise in the context of climate change. That sentence shows you don't understand the basics of climate science, even if you know something about weather.
All you do here is confirm the stereotypes about climate deniers.
Actually, nobody understands the basics of climate. If they did, then they would be able to predict it. Nobody can.
Climate change denial in a nutshell.
Devotee of a New Age Religion in a nutshell.Climate change denial in a nutshell.
You cannot be any further from the truth. I am all for alternative forms of energy. Just let it develop as the scientists and engineers advance the technology. Shutting down fossil fuels before the replacements are ready will create undue hardships on the working-class poor. Of course the elitist snobs have no regard for them.Yep, and instead of playing it safe by advancing renewables and increasing implementation, he figures it is better not to change his comfort/life style and let the kids worry about the future. Typical A******* boomer. Again, the smart money would be to increase interconnection and help the country be truly energy independent. Imagine a gas or coal plant that does not need to be fed - because nature feeds it! I guess Mitch would rather there be no rain and no pipe system and instead people have to bring buckets to the river or village well to collect water... very Mad Max / 3rd world that only 1 party is trying to lead us to.
You cannot be any further from the truth. I am all for alternative forms of energy. Just let it develop as the scientists and engineers advance the technology. Shutting down fossil fuels before the replacements are ready will create undue hardships on the working-class poor. Of course the elitist snobs have no regard for them.