Here's the situation: A recent hail storm did a bunch of damage to our 2015 P85 and now we are dealing with the insurance company regarding valuation to determine if the car will be totaled or fixed. We prefer that the car be fixed because it has had a bunch of things replaced by Tesla recently, including MCU, door handles, onboard charger, and most notably a new battery just a few weeks ago. Also, the insurance adjustor says that the insurance company prefers that it be fixed, too, because that's cheaper for them than totaling the car. The problem is the third-party valuation company that they hired is, in my opinion, doing a poor job, and the adjustor doesn't know enough to find fault with the report.
To determine a value on our car, the valuation company simply looked at other 2015 P85's that were sold and averaged the sale prices and ignored the recently replaced components. On the subject of the battery, for example, their assertion is that a potential buyer of a used 2015 P85 with 95,000 miles would not be willing to pay a penny more for an otherwise identical car that has a three week old battery that shows factory new rated range versus the original battery that has 95,000 miles use.
I think their assertion is absurd and that one of the first things a used BEV buyer should consider is how much battery degradation has occurred. There has to be some value difference between the two.
Similarly, Tesla replaced our MCU nine months ago. A knowledgeable Tesla buyer would know that MCU's suffer from failure due to memory degrading and find some greater value in an otherwise identical car with an MCU that's nine months old instead of four years old.
When comparing two otherwise identical P85's from 2015, what do you think the value difference is for the one with the new battery?
What's the added value for an MCU that's only nine months old?
Or an onboard charger that's only eight months old?
To determine a value on our car, the valuation company simply looked at other 2015 P85's that were sold and averaged the sale prices and ignored the recently replaced components. On the subject of the battery, for example, their assertion is that a potential buyer of a used 2015 P85 with 95,000 miles would not be willing to pay a penny more for an otherwise identical car that has a three week old battery that shows factory new rated range versus the original battery that has 95,000 miles use.
I think their assertion is absurd and that one of the first things a used BEV buyer should consider is how much battery degradation has occurred. There has to be some value difference between the two.
Similarly, Tesla replaced our MCU nine months ago. A knowledgeable Tesla buyer would know that MCU's suffer from failure due to memory degrading and find some greater value in an otherwise identical car with an MCU that's nine months old instead of four years old.
When comparing two otherwise identical P85's from 2015, what do you think the value difference is for the one with the new battery?
What's the added value for an MCU that's only nine months old?
Or an onboard charger that's only eight months old?