This is the kind of thing that really upsets me. I get the reasons why. Why would Tesla spend any effort to help you not have to give them money while they are accepting responsibility for you doing something they have no control over.
I guess in your case, it's up to you. If you know how to do the job, just do it. Epoxy sounds best solution in my mind, and if it were me I would weigh the pros and cons and take the plunge and fix myself. You are clearly no worse off than paying Tesla. (tongue in cheek)
But the result rests on your shoulders, not theirs.
Super annoying there is no trust / connection with customers as that is what builds for their next sale. Costs them very little. Especially when you consider what they must throw away in questionable (un justified) good will just to shut up a troublesome customer.
I’m not asking Tesla to accept responsibility for me fixing the door. I was just asking for what adhesive they recommend.
Actually, I got two emails after my post. The first was from the department that sent the estimate, asking me to review and approve the estimate. I replied to the estimate, stating I did not want anyone coming to reattach the magnet (I am at a higher risk of the virus due to cancer) and just wanted to know the adhesive to order. I also asked why I would have to pay approximately $200 when my ESA clearly indicated payment was due for only the first occurrence and I’ve had the charge port replaced 5 or 6 times (per my paperwork) already because the charge port door would not stay closed. Turns out, in the past, Tesla replaced the entire charge port when the door would not stay closed. However, rather than replacing the whole charge port as in the past (and which I always thought was a waste of good material), they will now simply reattach the magnet to the door. Thus, they say it’s a repair and not a replacement, and the deductible is due. It doesn’t bother me that much about the cost (after all, if one can afford to buy the car you should be afford to afford the repairs). It’s not the money itself that irks, it just feels like a sleazy way to get more money from a customer by saying it’s a repair of an item this time and not a replacement of that item.
I also got an email from the service center that did the annual checkup on my car some months ago. They are located several states away from where I am now, but it was the only service center email address I could find by searching my past service invoice emails. They gave me the information to use gorilla glue (which I happen to have where I am confined at the moment) or epoxy, although they said it is 50/50 whether it will hold forever and doing the repair (as opposed to doing a replacement) under the ESA is only warranted for one year. I have not checked whether this is true for the terms of my ESA issued many years ago.
Last edited: