JES2
Member
I believe @JES2 meant that when the grid came back online the excess solar power being produced by the panels was being stored ("diverted") by the Powerwall and not out to the grid. The grid does not do any "diversion" - either it's on or off.
With the smart meters in Texas, which they put in about a decade ago, then upgraded a few years back, each customer is now an independent entity. Before, you had everybody in a pool, and there was no differentiating between who got power. Now, Oncor has the capability of deciding who gets power or not, especially if there is not enough power to go around. (In this case, it wasn't a lack of power, but a lack of working transformers to provide the energy.) We have businesses and government agencies that did have power, but homes that did not. Oncor was able to send me an email basically stating when I should have power restored based on their priority. In a sense, the grid was online to me, but they were not sending me any power (based on my smart meter grouping.) My question was whether I would have been able to send electricity out (solar) in this state.
From my experience during grid outage simulation tests is that the Powerwall triggers the solar inverters to turn off when the battery is sufficiently full (>95%) by increasing the frequency of the power. What I saw with my microinverter set up is that this behavior can actually turn some, but not all, of the inverters off. While not perfect it does seem to keep the solar production close to in line with the house consumption when the grid is unavailable to sell power through, keeping the battery use minimal while the sun is shining. I have some details in my write up here My grid outage frequency issue is resolved!.
That makes sense. I know that the solar was still loading up the PW2s at 98% with the grid being down.