Garlan, these "proposals" are not feasible. What if you bought your car 31 days ago? Why are they less entitled then someone who bought the car 30 days ago? Your proposal to swap out cars is also way off base. Do you not understand that once the car has been titled it is then considered used so tesla would take a real beating trying to resell thousands of used cars they had taken back at full value? And again, what about the guy who got his car 31 days ago? I also don't understand where you come up with an $8000 voucher. What do you deserve $8000 for? The new AP2.0 it is $8000 so I'm assuming that is how you arrived at that figure but you miss a number of key points: #1- it is only $5000 more than someone who purchased AP1.0 would have paid before. #2-The AP1.0 cars are not suddenly going to no longer function making your $3000 option worthless. Frankly that proposal is the least logical of them all to me. The only time I can remember a manufacturer offering a voucher like you describe is when Dodge lowered the price of the Viper by $15,000 since it was a sales dud and gave a $15,000 voucher to current owners as a result of It looking like they overcharged them on their cars. And guess what the result of that was? A bunch of whiners that were perfectly happy to have paid the higher price for their car just before the price cut was announced and then did not appreciate getting a voucher when they were owed NOTHING.
Is anyone jaded over these Viper only 15k voucher coupons?
It's not just Tesla owners who are unreasonable it seems.
As to your last proposal I am not sure the Tesla will offer it but I will try to offer one for you: " I sympathize that you don't understand how unreasonable your proposals are". Is that helpful?