Black306
Active Member
300+ is enjoying the car.Ah - vertical scroll! Got it - thank you!
My reading is 403 Wh/m, but I only did 500 miles and I truly enjoyed driving my M3P!
400+ is racing it!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
300+ is enjoying the car.Ah - vertical scroll! Got it - thank you!
My reading is 403 Wh/m, but I only did 500 miles and I truly enjoyed driving my M3P!
Or cranking HVAC to the max300+ is enjoying the car.
400+ is racing it!LOL
300+ is enjoying the car.
400+ is racing it!LOL
No need to explain. Just messin’ around.To my defense: I do not drive on motorways and I like heated seats (and I do like the (safe) acceleration!).
Actually that is low26% is way adrift of what I would expect.
What is TeslaFi reporting for 'used' and 'added' for each charge compared with the meter?
I am of the understanding that 'used' should be similar to meter reading and the sum of all the kWh lost/used across drives, idles, sleeps should be similar to 'added'.
The kWh reported in the trip meter would then be similar to the 'kWh used' for the sum of the drives.
it is a valid point. The one that really gets me though is that with a petrol pump you get charged for the fuel that is delivered and its very well regulated. pumps have to be regularly calibrated etc.This raises a really interesting point for an accurate efficiency comparison, Ignoring preheating options for a moment, ICE cars use zero fuel when parked.
The equivalent is thinking that a ICE car looses 1% or more of the fuel in it's tank each day.
To be fair I had an old fiesta that did that. And 5% of its oil..This raises a really interesting point for an accurate efficiency comparison, Ignoring preheating options for a moment, ICE cars use zero fuel when parked.
The equivalent is thinking that a ICE car looses 1% or more of the fuel in it's tank each day.