You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was a rhetorical statement, not to be taken literally. But yes, I wrote that in haste before I realized that it was a converted Europa. In anticipation of this news, I was expecting an original Chrysler design in line with the concepts shown last January. You have to admit that with the addition of that Dodge label and racing stripes, the Europa looks like a Viper'ed up Tesla. My original comment was based on the assumption that this was a copycat body rather than a purchased one.Kidding? I don't think anyone in their financial position would kidd.They gotta be kidding...
Looks a bit familiar, don't it?
That was a rhetorical statement, not to be taken literally. But yes, I wrote that in haste before I realized that it was a converted Europa. In anticipation of this news, I was expecting an original Chrysler design in line with the concepts shown last January. You have to admit that with the addition of that Dodge label and racing stripes, the Europa looks like a Viper'ed up Tesla. My original comment was based on the assumption that this was a copycat body rather than a purchased one.
Anyhow, more EV offerings really is good news for the consumer. And it's about time one of the majors just did this. That is, their own conversion along the lines of the Ford Ranger or RAV4 EVs. Ultimately they may not sell as well as the unique body styles, but that can wait for version 2 (like the Prius).
So the WSJ says the batteries will come from A123. I wonder where they're sourcing the motors. ABG suggests that the Jeep has hub motors.
I am frankly thrilled--this may be my BEV that doesn't cost as much as a Tesla. Bet Tesla exec board is not happy about this one.
:tongue:Mine was rhetorical as well; darn computers.
Doesn't look like it has hub motors in this image. Plus it still has that huge differential. But yeah I think hub motors would be great for an off-road vehicle where handling isn't as much of an issue. Just as long as they can hold up to the abuse.I watched the CNBC clip and the Jeep has in-wheel hub motors.
We'll probably have to start a separate thread just about the Dodge EV since it's clearly aimed directly at the Roadster. But for now, I have to say that the more I look into this, the less impressed I am. If you look at the ABG gallery, you see evidence that these vehicles are rather kludgy. I mean they look fine for a small shop conversion, but kinda sad coming from a major. For example, some of the Jeep interior bits are blanked off with plastic and seem a bit misaligned, the charging port is at an odd angle since it's just replacing the fuel filler. On the DodgeEV, the motor driver, and I'd guess the motor and power electronics as well, are from UQM Technologies. Given that the rest of the car is likely from Lotus, I'm left wondering if any part, other than the badge on the front, is from Chrysler. I actually find it annoying when in that PR video, the driver refers to that Europa as a Dodge....the Dodge EV, which, like the Tesla Roadster, is based on a Lotus platform. It has a range of 150 to 200 miles and a top speed of more than 120 mph, thanks to a 26 kilowatt/hour battery, and was driven immediately after the presentation. A Dodge engineer, off the record, said he thought it could be a "Tesla killer."
We'll probably have to start a separate thread just about the Dodge EV since it's clearly aimed directly at the Roadster.
I'd guess the motor and power electronics as well, are from UQM Technologies.
Chrysler's push to develop electric vehicles began before Cerberus took an 80.1% stake in the company in August 2007, people familiar with the matter told the Wall Street Journal. For months, Chrysler held partnership talks with Tesla Motors Inc., a Silicon Valley start-up that is aiming to develop a line of electric cars, these people said, but the discussions broke off late last year.
AUBURN HILLS, Michigan (Reuters) - Chrysler LLC on Tuesday showed off a trio of electric vehicles in development -- including battery-powered versions of its Chrysler minivan and Jeep Wrangler -- and vowed to bring one of them to showrooms by 2010.
By showing off prototypes still in the planning stage, Chrysler was hoping to shake a costly association with gas-guzzling trucks and dispel doubts about the strength of its vehicle development program under the ownership of Cerberus Capital Management CBS.UL.
But Chrysler Chief Executive Bob Nardelli also warned that without approval for a $25-billion loan package before Congress, the automaker could be forced to cut jobs and costs more deeply to free up funds for its electric car campaign.
I have no idea what this is... looks like an NEV.
So this announcement and these cars mean two things. Slow the sales of the Tesla and it's ilk because now potential buyers have something more mainstream coming (remember hydrogen hype?) and two, have some quick-slap almost mule-like prototypes to get a bunch of money from taxpayers (and force out the little-guy manufactures).
I don't think that it is really the case that Chrysler hopes to slow the sales of Tesla. I think Chrysler sees the press GM is receiving from the Volt, and does not want to be perceived as being caught flat-footed as public sentiment swings over to fuel economy and plug-ins. It outsourced a few conversions that were relatively cheap and easy for it, so that it could issue some press releases around the time of the Volt unveiling to try and remain relevant in the publics mind.
The Dodge EV is similar enough to the Tesla that it can ride Tesla's hype a bit going forward - but they do not plan on selling many/any of them. The reason for making it is to get press, and possibly bring people into the show room to buy the minivan. Same as they did with the Viper.