You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes horrible for a car that's advertised as 3.2 0-60.
Brings up a good point. ICE cars perform better at sea level and cold air due to combustion, but in theory Teslas should perform better at higher altitudes and hot temps due to the thinner air.Get back to us once you’ve tested and documented the performance under the same standards & conditions used for the official figures.
Get back to us once you’ve tested and documented the performance under the same standards & conditions used for the official figures.
If these cars are anything they are remarkably consistent. There is no driver skill involved...and little variability from car to car.
True, and if Tesla quoted the Model 3P 0-60 mph with no rollout, 2 people in the car and heavy aftermarket wheels and tires, the results would likely look very similar to the OP’s...
It's because they calculate 0-60 with a roll out.
Not so sure. OP’s wheels are about 3# lighter per wheel than OE. Not sure about tire weight but you’re not talking about a difference that would cause a 0.4s slowdown. Same with a passenger unless they’re both offensive linemen. Maybe a tenth or two for both of those but not enough to explain a 3.6s. Something else is going on.
...you’re not talking about a difference that would cause a 0.4s slowdown....
You either don’t understand rollout or the effects of all of those specifics or are being deliberately obtuse...
You either don’t understand rollout or the effects of all of those specifics or are being deliberately obtuse...
He should be around 3.2s without rollout. 265 rubber and a passenger are not enough to knock 0.4s off his 0-60.