You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a pretty broad blanket statement that doesn't hold true in every single case. Best bet is to compare specific examples when shopping used.The other consideration is battery degradation, a used P90D is likely to have less range than a P85D at this point. The 90kw battery has a much faster degradation rate than an 85, on average at 40K miles they are holding a similar charge after that the 90 drops off a lot faster. I'd be looking for a P85D, currently they are valued slightly less than a P90D which IMHO is crazy. The P85D is a great blend of looks, power, luxury and the AP1 stills does most of the current autopilot functions as good as any.
How are you going to judge the degradation rate, going forward, of a particular car?That's a pretty broad blanket statement that doesn't hold true in every single case. Best bet is to compare specific examples when shopping used.
How are you going to judge the degradation rate, going forward, of a particular car?
To your point a 75D contains the same cells as the 100 series and offers very similar range as an 85 car due to how much the 85 packs were below their name plate rating when new (77KWH usable when new) and the general increases in efficiency with the newer car. I have started seeing 75D's for reasonable prices now, and wouldn't hesitate to buy one depending on my needs / wants. As mentioned previously we don't know the buyers needs / wants exactly so I can only speak generally.Wonder what the price delta is for those 17 extra miles going from P85D to P90D on the used market?
I personally would only consider a used P100D or 100D for this exact reason, less degradation, more range, no speculation on whether a 90 has issues or not, there is a lot of FUD out there on the 90, we have one and it rocks, but I wish I had gotten the 100D instead and won't make that mistake twice. Always buy the top range model for charging speed, range, durability, and resale value.
My understanding of the issue is that they contain more SiliconOstrichsak -
Since this isn't a for sale thread, I figure we can continue the conversation. I know we don't always see eye to eye, but I have a genuine question for you here given that you seem to know a lot about this.
The idea that is being brought up here, that the 90 batteries are inferior, is not a new idea. I have seen this oft repeated on these forms as well as others. If I recall correctly, there was something about the early generation 90 batteries being somehow inferior.supposedly, whatever the issue was was corrected in the later versions?
Was there an actual issue or something inherently inferior about the 90 batteries? If so, do you have an idea of what it was?
I personally had a 90 battery with no issues, but I honestly have no idea what generation it was, etc.
Interested to learn more about this.
Ryan
What does that have to do with what you said? Your blanket statement that a P90D was more likely to have more battery degradation than a P85D so it should be avoided & the P85D should be worth more is kind of a reach, to put it politely.
A P90D starts life with a rated 270 miles of range and is newer based on when the 90kWh packs came out. The P85D starts life at 253 miles of range and is older based on when the 85kWh packs came out. It would take a MUCH higher rate of degradation (given we're talking only 10% give or take a couple of percent after 4-5 years across the board for all cars and all packs) to make up that difference given those two factors and that's assuming ALL 90's have a higher rate of degradation than the 85's which simply isn't the case. You'd have to overcome the nearly 10% higher range out-of-the-gate and the one year or so less degradation based on age. Good luck.
It would take an exception to the degradation data set on the far positive side of the scale for the P85D and an exception to the data set on the far negative side of the scale for a P90D for it to actually have less range. In other words, you'd have to find to rare examples for that to hold true. Making a blanket statement that this is somehow the norm is kind of crazy based on how the planets would have to align for that statement to be factual.
This false premise that all of the 90 cars are somehow turds and should be avoided at all costs is hugely exaggerated. You're going to see roughly 5% degradation that first year of a new Tesla's life followed by a percent or two the year after and then it quickly drops to somewhere less than 1% per year after that, not counting outliers.
This idea that most P90D's will have less range than older P85D's and therefore should be avoided has based on no actual facts and is misleading.