You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You were able to get that price because the IV was so high on monday pre-earnings call? What was SP then? 738?Ok, what the ‘ell happened yesterday? I go on a day trip to my local service center (350 mi RT) for the annual service and you guys go and destroy the options market.
Well, I have a confession to make: On Monday I sold 4/30 -800/805c against all of my shares for $6.85-$8.50. I didn’t hit the peak because I got up late, but finally realized that I had some protection in each account. If the SP jumped, I could buyback my -670p, thereby releasing the covering cash which would be available to buyback the calls. In other accounts, I had bought some YOLO +790c with the last few $$$, so could sell for profit.
Anyway, everything dumped, so this AM, BTC@$0.20 and STO -755c @$0.80, again not at the optimal time, unlike that beast @Lycanthrope. I was able to pick up another 15 shares so far, with still enough buffer cash left for the SP to run a bit by Friday. I’m not declaring victory yet for this week, but so far it’s looking good.
Monday around 11:15EDT or so, certainly I could have done better in the 9:30-10:30 hour. I’m on the west coast, so 6:30am is difficult sometimes. Yes, pre-earnings, so lots of anticipation.You were able to get that price because the IV was so high on monday pre-earnings call? What was SP then? 738?
Monday around 11:15EDT or so, certainly I could have done better in the 9:30-10:30 hour. I’m on the west coast, so 6:30am is difficult sometimes. Yes, pre-earnings, so lots of anticipation.
FWIW, my Jan2023 +1100c dropped 18% today, almost to the price that I bought it back in November, so yes, it’s probably a decent time to buy LEAPS. Don’t rush in. Put in a lower offer and let them come to you. I think we will see SP malaise until the next quarter run up, so you probably have at least 3 mo, maybe 6 mo, to pick up cheaper LEAPS. Good luck.
I won't be do this yet... I still think Leaps are what you do over puddles... but I'm studying. I think the hard thing to understand is how selling calls against them would work.... if it's an extra step or has some other limitations besides not letting get ITM?Monday around 11:15EDT or so, certainly I could have done better in the 9:30-10:30 hour. I’m on the west coast, so 6:30am is difficult sometimes. Yes, pre-earnings, so lots of anticipation.
FWIW, my Jan2023 +1100c dropped 18% today, almost to the price that I bought it back in November, so yes, it’s probably a decent time to buy LEAPS. Don’t rush in. Put in a lower offer and let them come to you. I think we will see SP malaise until the next quarter run up, so you probably have at least 3 mo, maybe 6 mo, to pick up cheaper LEAPS. Good luck.
No, no, no. This is a longer term hold. I bought it back when I was just learning about options and LEAPS and now have a $400 sell price on it. I bought at $136 late last November. I should have sold it back in January for nearly $300, but decided to wait until after GF4&5 are running.So are you going sell your LEAPs? That what I am trying to decide right now.
Statistically speaking, stonks only go up so shares + CC should earn you more than cash + CP.
If you're an expert at charting then it makes more sense to to just skip option selling altogether and just buy/sell shares.
What I meant was, since as you stated - the premium earned on CC is pretty much the same as a CP. by holding shares you also reap the reward from owning an appreciating asset compared to just holding cash. I could have been be more clear.That's very much opposite of true. At the 'statistical' broad brush level, the P/L of a covered call and an equivalent cash covered put are all but the same.
Of course, those who are familiar with my approach know I'd rather have a CC than a cash covered put...but that's based in nuance, not a first order comparison.
I wouldn't go that far on selling options (for credit) and I'd expand then statement such that if one is good at reading charts one should very much be buying options. But really, it boils up to a combination of The Right Analysis and applying that to The Right Position. Position types (shares, sold options, multi-leg options, shorts vs longs, etc.) are all tools on the same tool belt; they all serve a purpose.
Despite the popularity of this thread, selling options is (or at least should be) generally low on the priority list for anyone involved in the market due to its low return, high capital requirement, and high Risk:Reward...but of course there's certainly a time and place for selling and so it shouldn't be completely removed from one's tool belt.
What's really is important for folks to understand how a position (Any position) returns profit, the corollary risk of that position, and how that position might fit an individual's bigger picture market strategy. For options, the two major upsides over shares are 1) Leverage and 2) Volatility. (Those two are also equivalent downsides FTR). Leverage allows a trader to make (or lose) multiple times on the options vs shares--that one is pretty straightforward. Volatility enables a trader to earn profit at a more favorable rate (with lower risk) than an ~equivalent share position. This one can go both ways--for a bought option, a decreasing volatility environment will work against profit relative to shares and an increasing volatility environment will work for profit.
The bummer for selling options is that leverage is much less...leveragable, if not eliminated vs shares (which I think is your overall point) so one basically ~halves the benefit of options over shares.
So circling back to a trader's analysis skillset, if one is good at reading price charts, one should be directional trading, either via shares or [primarily] buying options. If one is also competent at understanding volatility, one should be layering that logic into their position as well. As a random real world implementation of this logic, maybe a strategy is to only buy options at low volatility, only sell options at high volatility, and only trade shares at mid-volatility.
So question here... at first I said, holy moly that's a low strike point! But I'm wondering if the reason you aren't concerned is you ability to time the roll? Are you going to roll it up if stock surges before it hits 715? And that's why it doesn't concern you? Right into the teeth of the Max Pain!Agree, after looking I also took a chance on selling cc705 at $10. If price continues in downward direction I'll probably close out my cc800 and move them down too. My sold p700 also was looking tenuous and I decided to go ahead and roll 2 weeks out to a May 14 p680 strike.
I am as surprised at this week's price action as anyone else...
Just picking up the part I've highlighted, which TBH I don't agree with, but perhaps don't understand where you're coming from eitherThat's very much opposite of true. At the 'statistical' broad brush level, the P/L of a covered call and an equivalent cash covered put are all but the same.
Of course, those who are familiar with my approach know I'd rather have a CC than a cash covered put...but that's based in nuance, not a first order comparison.
I wouldn't go that far on selling options (for credit) and I'd expand then statement such that if one is good at reading charts one should very much be buying options. But really, it boils up to a combination of The Right Analysis and applying that to The Right Position. Position types (shares, sold options, multi-leg options, shorts vs longs, etc.) are all tools on the same tool belt; they all serve a purpose.
Despite the popularity of this thread, selling options is (or at least should be) generally low on the priority list for anyone involved in the market due to its low return, high capital requirement, and high Risk:Reward...but of course there's certainly a time and place for selling and so it shouldn't be completely removed from one's tool belt.
What's really is important for folks to understand how a position (Any position) returns profit, the corollary risk of that position, and how that position might fit an individual's bigger picture market strategy. For options, the two major upsides over shares are 1) Leverage and 2) Volatility. (Those two are also equivalent downsides FTR). Leverage allows a trader to make (or lose) multiple times on the options vs shares--that one is pretty straightforward. Volatility enables a trader to earn profit at a more favorable rate (with lower risk) than an ~equivalent share position. This one can go both ways--for a bought option, a decreasing volatility environment will work against profit relative to shares and an increasing volatility environment will work for profit.
The bummer for selling options is that leverage is much less...leveragable, if not eliminated vs shares (which I think is your overall point) so one basically ~halves the benefit of options over shares.
So circling back to a trader's analysis skillset, if one is good at reading price charts, one should be directional trading, either via shares or [primarily] buying options. If one is also competent at understanding volatility, one should be layering that logic into their position as well. As a random real world implementation of this logic, maybe a strategy is to only buy options at low volatility, only sell options at high volatility, and only trade shares at mid-volatility.
I'm on the same boat. I can boost my yearly return in this stock by 50-75% on top of price appreciation. Having followed events, max pain, volume, together with some light chart reading, I have a pretty good idea of how the stock performs outside of an event reaction window. But I don't buy options, perhaps due to my personality?Just picking up the part I've highlighted, which TBH I don't agree with, but perhaps don't understand where you're coming from either
Using myself as an example, I have 3253 $TSLA - that's up 353 shares, roughly 12% since December due to call selling and reinvesting the bulk of the premiums in more shares
As I don't have cash to buy more shares, what would you propose that's better for increasing my portfolio than what I'm doing?
Edit: to add that I don't have a margin account to play with, my broker only offers based on a "loan application" which is laughable in my situation
Just picking up the part I've highlighted, which TBH I don't agree with, but perhaps don't understand where you're coming from either
Using myself as an example, I have 3253 $TSLA - that's up 353 shares, roughly 12% since December due to call selling and reinvesting the bulk of the premiums in more shares
As I don't have cash to buy more shares, what would you propose that's better for increasing my portfolio than what I'm doing?
Edit: to add that I don't have a margin account to play with, my broker only offers based on a "loan application" which is laughable in my situation
Just picking up the part I've highlighted, which TBH I don't agree with, but perhaps don't understand where you're coming from either
As I don't have cash to buy more shares, what would you propose that's better for increasing my portfolio than what I'm doing?
So question here... at first I said, holy moly that's a low strike point! But I'm wondering if the reason you aren't concerned is you ability to time the roll? Are you going to roll it up if stock surges before it hits 715? And that's why it doesn't concern you? Right into the teeth of the Max Pain!
But I don't buy options, perhaps due to my personality?
The way I look at it: you can't always buy options but you can always sell options, although for a lower return at times. I like a predictable stream of income.
curious, any reason people people on this forum who prefer doing weeklies are not simply selling say, 500 shares today, and selling puts? particularly if in tax free account?
An hour ago, his trade looked ballsy. Now, it's starting to just look freaking clairvoyant.
I'm very responsive to changes so maybe it is what I prefer only at this stage in my trading career, if you can even call it that...You prefer lower returns for higher risk and more work?
Some people prefer to eat at Mickey Dees every day, others prefer to hit the Michelin star once a month.
I know which path my body prefers...