You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can't believe Reuters bought it on the dumbest reason I have ever seen. I was like..so Tesla will deploy robotaxis to compete against byd's 10k car what?It'd be too typical of Elon to set up a fake meeting and have one of his employees give Reuters fake news then he be on standby and debunk it on X.
or like was rumored before where different messages went to different folks so leakers would "self identify"It'd be too typical of Elon to set up a fake meeting and have one of his employees give Reuters fake news then he be on standby and debunk it on X
More than likely it’s SOME truth, but more than likely it’s something like “not planning to build the Model 2 in MEXICO at this time”… since MEXICO is on hold, and Model 2 is apparently going to FIRST be built in Tejas. (I can say that since I’m Austin born)Zero chance that "report" is true. ZERO.
Especially with two different code names used. But three people supposedly confirmed it...or like was rumored before where different messages went to different folks so leakers would "self identify"
Where is the SEC? This was blatant SP manipulation.
it is always the same three persons "familiar with the matter", I guess . SOOO cheap.Especially with two different code names used. But three people supposedly confirmed it...
Slight OT .... the basic problem is Elon has no idea how it will work out. You can't look at the trend when disengagement rate goes from 2 per mile to 1 per mile and think every few months it will "exponentially" go down. Whole of V10 and V11, disengagement rate hardly budged. With 12, I think it has moved a bit .... but early days. Nowhere near enough data to assume an exponential trend like he does (just because it happened in AlphaGo).He does, I remember on an OLD podcast they have an internal chart of disengagements and interventions and it had a clear trend and he said thats why he truly believes that every year FSD will be solved that year
If only you could have drawn these yellow lines in January.. ;-0
If you have proof this article was to manipulate SP, I'm sure SEC would like to hear. But I doubt you have anything .... just because a piece of news moves SP doesn't mean the news was published to move SP.Where is the SEC? This was blatant SP manipulation.
Don't call the bottom until after ER.Maybe we know the bottom now ($160)?
Because that was some terrible news
Should have drilled down to $140
It held the bottom range
The lines have always been there. Whether we break down from one and get to the next is the problem.If only you could have drawn these yellow lines in January.. ;-0
Nobody suggested it was an intentional leak by Tesla to the news. Just that false information could have been shared with employees, that are subject to an NDA, such that if it did leak they could narrow down who the leakers are.doubly so if the folks currently in this thread suggesting it was an intentional fake leak to the news BY Tesla are correct.
Don't call the bottom until after ER.