About the dumbest thing I've ever readIf you have proof this article was to manipulate SP, I'm sure SEC would like to hear. But I doubt you have anything .... just because a piece of news moves SP doesn't mean the news was published to move SP.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
About the dumbest thing I've ever readIf you have proof this article was to manipulate SP, I'm sure SEC would like to hear. But I doubt you have anything .... just because a piece of news moves SP doesn't mean the news was published to move SP.
Nobody suggested it was an intentional leak by Tesla to the news.
It'd be too typical of Elon to set up a fake meeting and have one of his employees give Reuters fake news then he be on standby to debunk it on X.
You're leaving out a ton of important context.Places that benefit the most from the entry level cars being China, India, and EU doesn't even have FSD. Head of Tesla policy just day was tweeting about FSDb approval is extremely difficult in EU. So yeah this news is only true if Tesla management's are high.
However, I can see management keeping the truth wrapped because the entry level cars are osbourning current line up.
What’s slightly more interesting though is that this move down started at 08:00 PST, and the Reuters article hit ~ 22 minutes ago closer to 08:30. I’m not at a BBT, is anyone, can you see the time stamp?Maybe we know the bottom now ($160)?
Because that was some terrible news
Should have drilled down to $140
It held the bottom range
I'm SURE that nobody made any money when the story came out, because nobody knew when the story was going to be released....If you have proof this article was to manipulate SP, I'm sure SEC would like to hear. But I doubt you have anything .... just because a piece of news moves SP doesn't mean the news was published to move SP.
The burden of proof is upon you - I can't prove a negative.I'm SURE that nobody made any money when the story came out, because nobody knew when the story was going to be released....
Except the Rueters has a history of doing this. I've been saying Tesla should be building a case against Reuters for years, they have plenty of data/evidence at this point.The burden of proof is upon you - I can't prove a negative.
SP doesn't care about patterns - big news always tramples over carefully drawn lines/patterns.It’s actually a triple-bottom
$160.51 x2
$161.01
Triple bottom target: $207
If we retest and break $160.51 it’s a new low and we break the rectangle pattern.
Thats not proof. Reuters has also produced a million pieces of news that turn out to be correct. Tesla also has a history of saying something is wrong but it happens (like price cuts later, in China).Except the Rueters has a history of doing this. I've been saying Tesla should be building a case against Reuters for years, they have plenty of data/evidence at this point.
Reuters can only claim ignorance so many times.
BTO nov 24 C120 @ $57.32
2 lows are exactly the same 160.51If 160 holds all the way through earnings and that turns out to be the bottom...man that was defended hard by investors.
I guess no one expected a correction from Elon
This is the post Elon was responding to:
closed for 94% gains - just incase there are more antics thanks FUDRuetersSold some 160 PUTS for $1.12 for today .. CC monies, so assignment is OK, will wheel next week
I guess no one expected a correction from Elon