You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you truly think there have been no changes since q3, then I suggest that you didn't listen to the call. Breaking ground on a factory in a month, installing a new line in two. Also the huge job fair, the lathrop facility, china shipments started....
So working off of hummingbird’s notes, Q4’s guidance, Barclays, DaveT’s productions estimates, and my fairly limited time browsing these forums.
(hummingbird's notes)
2013 Q1 produced 5000, guided to deliver 4500, delivered 4900 (an 8.88% beat)
2013 Q2 produced 5500, guided to deliver 4500, delivered 5150 (a 14.444% beat)
2013 Q3 produced 6600, guided to deliver 5000, delivered 5500 (a 10% beat)
2013 Q4 produced 6587, guided to deliver 6000, delivered 6892 (a 14.8667 beat)
With an average of a 12.05% beat in sold cars
I’m concluding three different scenarios. A worst, conservative, and best case. These will include sales #’s, Gigafactory events, possible Model X suprises, and expenditures. I will ignore guidance for now, I don’t really know how to guestimate their production and sales I’ll leave that up to you guys. I will assume that we are entering the report with todays 207$ price.
Worst Case
#’s
2014 Q1 produces 7400, guided to deliver 6400, delivers ~6400.
This is assuming that TSLA doesn’t keep with its previous history of having a ~12% beat in in sold vs. guidance.
Gigafactory
Locations haven’t been decided, partner hasn’t been decided, we are told they are still working everything out.
Model X
No new information
Expenditures
The 15% was a lowball, R&D expenses increase because of Model X delays, SG & A spending increases as expected because of SC’s.
Thoughts
So where does this put us on the morning of 5/9/2014? Tesla has been hurting, already having a serious drop leaving the price at the time of this post $207.73. A failure to match a historical beat, no new information with the Gigafactory or Model X and lower margins this could be a painful drop. Sub 200 surely but how far?
Likelihood
This, I doubt, is a very likely scenario. TM has been pretty consistent in lowballing and beating expectations. But there is a first for everything.
We are also talking about a spectrum of possibilities here. What if we still get around 6900 sold with no new information on the Gigafactory, or model X, and we have higher than projected expenditures?
Conservative Case
#’s
2014 Q1 produces 7400-7600, guided to deliver 6400, delivers ~6600-6800
This is meeting Barclays + a little bit more, not quite the 12% historical beat , but still above guidance.
Gigafactory
Locations have been decided, but no partner announcement.
Model X
Everything is on track, no delays.
Expenditures
The 15% is still a lowball, but other expenditures are within projected ranges.
Thoughts
Pain still. I would still consider this a disappointment, I don’t know about you guys but no matter what these #'s will be spun as evidence of slower demand or a plateau. Sub 200 still maybe in the 170 – 180$ range for the short term. Depending on what is revealed with the Model X and the Gigafactory we will keep our heads in the 190$’s
Likelihood
I’m really placing a hedge for this possibility. It’s not outlandish, and Barclays is banking on the numbers. However it seems like a strong possibility that the Gigafactory scenario will occur. We don’t have any definitive evidence that Panasonic is ready yet, or anyone else.
Best Case
#’s
2014 Q1 produces 7500-7800, guided to deliver 6400, delivers ~7000-7300
Based on DaveT’s two estimates. Hits the 12% beat perhaps 14%. 15% and TM would have to say something right? This question still hasn't been answered.
Giga
Locations picked, ground breaking planned, partnership is concrete.
Model X
Everything on track, perhaps some goals accomplished earlier than expected
Expenditures
15% was accurate, R&D expenditures are larger than Q4 but not surprisingly so, same with SG&A.
Thoughts
Everything is really as expected and more. Perhaps a similar situation to Q2 2013 depending on the reaction to everything else? Likely more depressed considering the current downtrend. 220-250 maybe? 260-290 in the wildest case?
Likelihood
This is where my bet will go. DaveT’s estimates are reasonable on sold cars and are in line with TM history. A 15-20% beat is unlikely. I doubt we will be ahead of the game with the model X, but I trust Elon with the Gigafactory even though I will still hedge against it. I think expenditures will be higher than expected but not by a surprising amount, based on Q4 data.
Conclusion
While I'll be placing my bet for TM to have a good earnings I still see a lot more room to fall with the conservative and worst case scenarios. A mediocre report is a bad report for Tesla, and we've been promised a mediocre quarter. I would like for people to chip in on what guidance could do in each case. I do expect guidance to be lukewarm though, as production was set to really increase in the second half of this year. I will likely put a larger hedge than I have with other earnings reports.
Again that is the future of the company, that is what was promised.
So the results we got were the worst case out of those three.
You must have been considering the price drop from 2013 NOV 5 to 8. The 2013 Q3 TSLA earnings report was released after the market close on November 5. The second incident of a Model S crashing into road debris resulting in a battery igniting occurred on November 6 and was reported by the media on November 7. Therefore, I would not describe the situations six months ago and today to be “trading under very similar circumstances.”
My apologies. However, even without the fires it would seem like we are seeing similar results. I have no doubt that the people that want to see this stock lower will have similar misleading stories to throw out this week and next.
I really don't think you listened to the call.
Like the story that nothing has changed in the last 6 months....
Well then, everyone trading today has really bad ears.
True.
One of the first articles I saw yesterday said that Tesla missed analyst consensus, because they mixed up consensus 699m non-gaap revenue with actual 624m gaap revenue. So they called it a 75million miss. This is, of course, not the case. But that's an example of people trading with bad ears. That sort of thing has been all over the place, tons of headlines of Tesla posting a loss, which didn't happen.
So this is exactly what you said two comments up, about misleading stories to throw out this week and next. The company is brighter than it was 6 months ago and brighter than it was 3 months ago, so either the stock price was too high 3 months ago, or it's depressed now. Or both.
"Brighter" in promises, which I have no doubt that Elon can fulfill, I just don't think TSLA's value should reflect promises. At least in the short term.
Okay, so, you said you wanted a discussion, in a discussion what we do is read what the other person says, instead of just saying the same thing over and over. I already responded to this promises thing at least twice. You're saying that the only thing that has changed is promises, which is both not true since many things have changed, but also wholly material to the stock price, because the stock price is about the future of the company, always and forever, for every company, as that is the nature and entire purpose of the stock market's existence.
And if not, then I would like to buy some AMZN stock from you for 0 dollars, since they've never produced much significant profit so clearly their company is worth nothing and has no future, correct?
Okay, so, you said you wanted a discussion, in a discussion what we do is read what the other person says, instead of just saying the same thing over and over.
Here you go again:
Please read the rest of the post. You seem to be saying that nothing at all has changed since Q3. We didn't know at all about the gigafactory in Q3, so that has changed. Deliveries to China had not started, so that has changed. There wasn't a job fair to hire thousands of people. There wasn't a facility in Lathrop. Demand has continued to increase. There are still zero competitors.
Not only do we have more view of the future of the company now than we did then, we also have more information of what has happened in the last 6 months. If you really think nothing is changed, then you have had your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears.
Or, if what you think is that companies should only ever be valued on what has happened in the past, and never take into account the future of the company whatsoever, then I think perhaps that the stock market is not your thing.
They both reflect what the company WILL be doing, not what they are currently doing.
...I still think its too high now until the Model X's are actually being made and the GF is actually being built.
Basically meeting expectations in a negative market environment was not good enough
Fine, then wait to buy shares (or cover shorts) until those events occur and pay the going price at that time. I'll bet that will be a significantly higher price than today. Investors really do pay for future prospects, and not just what can be gleaned from data of a completed quarter.
They beat expectations. And the call was full of new things.