I'm not a lawyer, etc, but one thing I wonder about the Street Insider piece... all these factory details are eye-openers, particularly I bet to those who've done the tour in the past after first signing an NDA. (How the heck did this analyst get to reveal these details? No NDA?)
Is it not the case that the way NDAs usually work is that "confidential information" is info which is not already public. Well, that article seems to have disclosed a lot of until-now non-public information. If it's now public, then if others see or hear this information on future tours it'd be interesting to get further confirmation. Wondering if confirming a particular claim made in this article, based on subsequent factory tours, would be kosher or violate the NDA?