You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok, there has been some enthusiasm for Tesla that has left SolarCity in the dust. The spread opened up to $11.63. This is pretty plum for buying SolarCity. Be careful paying too much for Tesla when it gets ahead of SolarCity.
If TSLA shorts are closing hard, that could induce a wider spread.
Why do you keep putting words in my mouth? They haven't completed their due diligence yet, and it's going to take 2-3 months after that to complete the deal. Do you think that they will complete the vote within about two weeks from today?No need to get rude here. Why do you think that "completing the deal" is synonymous with the vote? Vote will precede the "completing the deal" part as there is no sense of complete the deal if vote to the proposal is "no". Fred was asking about timing of the vote, not the "completing the deal" part, so the lecturing regarding listening to the calls seem to be misplaced here.
Thanks!Fact #1 is sum of the shares held by five largest institutional investors: Fidelity, Billie Gifford, Price T. Rowe, Bank of Montreal and Vanguard. Information is coming form the Nasdaq Site, and I've summarized it in the table included in this post.
Fact # 7 is total quantity of shares owned by all institutional shareholders at the end of Q1, available from the Nasdaq Site.
Thanks again!I think you need to reed tweets by Ihor Dusaniwsky, head of research at S3 Partners LLC (and not a TSLA fan) to understand that scenario you outlined is not plausible. Start from here.
I didn't miss that. Just because you repeated it doesn't mean it's correct! The last time you posted almost the exact same thing in response to a post of mine you distorted or misunderstood me in exactly the same way. Only the last time you said under $200. When did I say that the SP would go back to under $200. You make up things to disagree with, then say that I'm wrong!I've addressed this a couple of times. The gist of this, if you missed it, is that the massive run-up in price due to the crisis of liquidity for short sellers will inevitably wipe a lot of them out, reducing pool of money available for short selling activities. Additionally, as SP sky rockets, the amount of collateral/margin per share required from the short sellers will sky rocket as well, along with the interest they pay. So the will be hit with double whammy: reduced pool of money for shorting as well as increased in capital required to short. There will be a roll-back, but not to the lower $200-eds; in fact I believe not even $200-eds at all.
Yay, 2am wake up call for us in Europe. I just hope I won't have to listen to techno music until 3am...SMP will go live around 5pm, assuming Pacific.
Tweets with replies by Elon Musk (@elonmusk) | Twitter
Why do you keep putting words in my mouth? They haven't completed their due diligence yet, and it's going to take 2-3 months after that to complete the deal. Do you think that they will complete the vote within about two weeks from today?
I believe that there could be multiple fundamental items accounting for the rise. There's also the squeeze the effects of which I am saying will be temporary.
The short squeeze related SP peak has to be on the effective date. Agree?
And this is all on a very low volume...
Just wait until momentum trading folks will show up...
Broke through 229 after much difficulty. Should be a nice move higher to the close
If the effective date/range is in the future. Otherwise nothing happens. Like I said it might be in the interest of decision makers on this one to avoid any big SP moves so "nothing happens" looks to me like a realistic scenario.