Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Short-Term TSLA Price Movements - 2016

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
willy-wonka-gene-wilder-suspense-terrible-hope-it-lasts-1366673783y.gif
 
Ok, there has been some enthusiasm for Tesla that has left SolarCity in the dust. The spread opened up to $11.63. This is pretty plum for buying SolarCity. Be careful paying too much for Tesla when it gets ahead of SolarCity.

If TSLA shorts are closing hard, that could induce a wider spread.

@jhm I bought some SCTY shares at the open this morning after Elon's statement yesterday that he expected a supermajority vote in favor of the merger -- IMO he would not make this statement unless he had a high level of confidence that the deal would go through.

While we're killing time waiting for SMP2, I'd be curious to hear if anyone has a theory why rational SCTY shorts aren't closing out their SCTY positions at this point. Even if they had fundamental issues with the TSLA/SCTY combination it seems like a better deal to short TSLA instead since it is now priced at a premium to SCTY, and interest rates are less than half to boot. And if their main issue was with SCTY they might decide to just cut their losses or take their gains and get out.

Is it just a combination of stubbornness plus a hope of catching a break of some sort and getting a better price to exit before the merger? Or do they think Elon is mistaken about the merger going through. Something else?

Or will they just try to spin FUD around SMP2 and if that doesn't stick head for the hills?
 
Last edited:
No need to get rude here. Why do you think that "completing the deal" is synonymous with the vote? Vote will precede the "completing the deal" part as there is no sense of complete the deal if vote to the proposal is "no". Fred was asking about timing of the vote, not the "completing the deal" part, so the lecturing regarding listening to the calls seem to be misplaced here.
Why do you keep putting words in my mouth? They haven't completed their due diligence yet, and it's going to take 2-3 months after that to complete the deal. Do you think that they will complete the vote within about two weeks from today?

Maybe I should have clarified that I wasn't only referring to Fred's post. I lost my patience with all of the SCTY acquisition complaint posts, in which it was clear that they were not familiar with the contents of the calls.
Fact #1 is sum of the shares held by five largest institutional investors: Fidelity, Billie Gifford, Price T. Rowe, Bank of Montreal and Vanguard. Information is coming form the Nasdaq Site, and I've summarized it in the table included in this post.

Fact # 7 is total quantity of shares owned by all institutional shareholders at the end of Q1, available from the Nasdaq Site.
Thanks!

I think you need to reed tweets by Ihor Dusaniwsky, head of research at S3 Partners LLC (and not a TSLA fan) to understand that scenario you outlined is not plausible. Start from here.
Thanks again!

I've addressed this a couple of times. The gist of this, if you missed it, is that the massive run-up in price due to the crisis of liquidity for short sellers will inevitably wipe a lot of them out, reducing pool of money available for short selling activities. Additionally, as SP sky rockets, the amount of collateral/margin per share required from the short sellers will sky rocket as well, along with the interest they pay. So the will be hit with double whammy: reduced pool of money for shorting as well as increased in capital required to short. There will be a roll-back, but not to the lower $200-eds; in fact I believe not even $200-eds at all.
I didn't miss that. Just because you repeated it doesn't mean it's correct! The last time you posted almost the exact same thing in response to a post of mine you distorted or misunderstood me in exactly the same way. Only the last time you said under $200. When did I say that the SP would go back to under $200. You make up things to disagree with, then say that I'm wrong!

I believe that there could be multiple fundamental items accounting for the rise. There's also the squeeze the effects of which I am saying will be temporary. Please don't come back with a made up figure and use it to claim that you are correct and I'm wrong. I'm getting really tired of that.
 
Why do you keep putting words in my mouth? They haven't completed their due diligence yet, and it's going to take 2-3 months after that to complete the deal. Do you think that they will complete the vote within about two weeks from today?

Once the deal is a go from shareholders it'll take a while to drag it through all the formalities. To be crystal clear, "complete" is when SCTY ticker disappears.

Looks to me best possible scenario is board approves, then say 2 weeks for a vote with a retroactive holding rule, then 2 months for regulatory approval.
 
  • Helpful
Reactions: EinSV
I believe that there could be multiple fundamental items accounting for the rise. There's also the squeeze the effects of which I am saying will be temporary.


My view is that some part of the squeeze (40%, 60%, or 80%?) will be temporary. I think smart guys on Wall Street are miles ahead of us in plotting their game plans to maximize profits.

The only thing that is certain this time though, unlike previous short squeezes, is the timeline. That timeline hinges around effective date for voting on the merger deal. The short squeeze related SP peak has to be on the effective date. Agree?
 
Broke through 229 after much difficulty. Should be a nice move higher to the close

The vertical run up above 229 started one minute after Elon's tweet about SMP2 being out about close of trading time today. We hit about 229.70 and then the profit-taking phase set in. Honestly, I don't see how people can say that anticipation of the SMP2 release has no significant effect on trading.

That said, I agree with vgrinshpun that the recall process could be an enormous catalyst and is certainly at work right now. My guess on the timing of the recalls by brokerages is that they recalled enough shares to adjust supply of TSLA short shares below demand and thereby engineer a shortage of short shares, which allowed them to significantly raise the interest rate charged for those short shares. The brokerages are playing this recall right now in order to maximize profits, which is not surprising at all.

My point is that the recall sets the stage for a squeeze, but longs need to join the buying to get things rolling at this stage of the game, and the SMP2 anticipation has served that purpose.

Edit: When we look back at anticipation for SMP2, we will likely surmise that the anticipation of the event was the real catalyst. For this reason, all of the tweets Elon has made, and all of the delays, have served a purpose. Now, let's see the SMP2 and enjoy the vision of Tesla's future.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SunCatcher and stef
If the effective date/range is in the future. Otherwise nothing happens. Like I said it might be in the interest of decision makers on this one to avoid any big SP moves so "nothing happens" looks to me like a realistic scenario.

We should keep in mind though that Elon has deep dislike towards short sellers, I think he want to bury them 6 feet under. A shock treatment like this would likely ensure much less short interest in future. Once bitten twice shy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.