Value Ev
Middle seat belt specialist.
Funny.
It is now considered news when an employee says something glowing about their company.
We need a "PR disguised as news" forum.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the topic last night was brought up by a long... not me... would you like them to leave the board too?
The S-4 is now effective, yet I do not see any filings from Tesla requesting acceleration of review or anything else from the SEC. I'm confused! I've never seen a merger S-4 be approved by the SEC without comment (or even a letter indicating that the SEC has reviewed and has no comments), but it appears that's what has happened.Paging @esk8mw: Tesla just filed "Notice of Effectiveness" with Oct 12 as "Effectiveness Date" : Notice of Effectiveness
What is significance of this - completion of the SEC review?
A computer driver can handle cases 20 times more complicated than this. Think how a human driver would handle the situation. A computer can do exactly the same: signal, back out, change lane, keep going.Not really about Shor term SP, but now I am not optimistic on autonomous driving. Last night I saw some one drive near the curb slowly, and suddenly stopped. Looked like he was trying to find a location along the way. I have no doubt that AI can avoid collision with this, but I doubt AI will be smart enough to decide to turn and pass this guy, in a reasonable time.
As long as there are human drivers on the road, computer AI will not be smart enough to deal with them. Their behavior is just unpredictable.
You folks know there's no such thing as AI right? All we're capable of for the foreseeable future is to program a response based on input.
Incorrect. Tesla's approach for autonomous is narrow AI.You folks know there's no such thing as AI right? All we're capable of for the foreseeable future is to program a response based on input.
Narrow AI isn't AI. That's like saying a calculator is AI
I came here looking for some insight about why the stock is down this morning. Thinking maybe I missed some news that happened last night, I went back to the posts as of 5:00pm EST yesterday. An hour later, after wading through a ton of drivel about AI and bickering about people's credentials, I have learned nothing about the short term value of the stock. @AudubonB - please get this thread back on track.
Same here.I came here looking for some insight about why the stock is down this morning. Thinking maybe I missed some news that happened last night, I went back to the posts as of 5:00pm EST yesterday. An hour later, after wading through a ton of drivel about AI and bickering about people's credentials, I have learned nothing about the short term value of the stock. @AudubonB - please get this thread back on track.
Statistically (though with a low p value) Tesla's CURRENT autopilot offering is safer than human drivers. It is more safe for the general public with them using it than without, even though it isn't perfect yet. Level 5 is unnecessary, even level 4 is unnecessary to save lives and improve safety so it's a bit of a facile argument. Level 4 will be here in 2 years time, level 5 won't take much longer.but we are talking about the safety of the general public here vs the sake of stock price growth... and that is what we are talking about. if you weren't interested in the stock rising then you wouldn't be interested so emphatically... and much of this race for technology is about stock price... it shouldn't be that way.
Mathematically speaking, you are incorrect so we might as well move on from thisnegative... this is one subject that I'm totally disconnected from my personal interests for... and I see it as being exploited and prematurely advanced for the sake of stock price.