Yes. Buying before a disappointing ER to signal that the fundamentals are still sound.
Would not buying before a surprisingly good ER be insider trading?
1, Buying after a disappointing ER would be an even bigger sign to show he has long term faith in the company even as the stock falls. Plus, he would have had to pay less taxes too.
2, Has been answered. Insider trading is not defined by whether the stock falls or climbs after you made deals based on insider information. CEOs always have insider information, so according to your definition they could never trade their own company's stock. But they can, hence, the usual 2 week moratorium pre ER. (I am not this smart, just read smarter people writing on this on this thread :tongue: )
Folding 2nd row seats in the X :wink:
Oh nooo, you did not! I'll give you 1 point for the punchline of the day.
In theory, you are perfectly correct. In fact he can chose he will not answer a single question at all. However, should he avoid all uncomfortable questions and give BS answers, the headlines would burry TSLA the next day and he knows that. i don't expect such behavior.Elon has some freedom in what to disclose. He may not answer the Model X ramp-up questions clearly (using real numbers), and give only vague answers like "making progress". Bulls will read that as real progress, bears will read that as problems, and we will all be at the same place we are now.
IMO, if the Q1 delivery guidance will be separated into X and S numbers, it will be a good sign that Model X issues are fixed.