Possibly slightly off topic takedown of BYD competition FUD or just something to read while the stock completes its U-turn into an all-out rally.
View attachment 170014 Little photo of yours truly in a public area of BYD Shenzhen.
BYD won't. Absolutely not. Last time I was at BYD they had barely got to grips with vehicle manufacturing techniques mastered in the West in the 1970s for their BYD E6 and they seriously backed the wrong rustled horse with Lithium Iron Phosphate. The BYD I met are primarily motivated by not getting sued for battery *ires - and until far too recently and probably to this day they rigidly imagined that pacifying the chemistry was the way to do that and under no circumstances could they comprehend the idea of the routing the output of a battery to bypass an in-series PCM let alone a high current DC charging input because according to them that had never succeeded that was not how it's done. The culture I met there tended to know whatever they learned in a Chinese university whose primary function was to aggregate and disseminate knowledge of techniques studied at Western and Japanese joint ventures (effectively state ratified and funded industrial espionage) and then that knowledge appeared to freeze in a time warp in whoever graduated. I witnessed no ability to innovate or even countenance it in the engineers I met there. In fact the LiFePO4 mainstay of the BYD battery business is a battery chemistry design John Goodenough is on the record to state was stolen from him - lifted without recompense in the middle ages of Lithium secondary battery development - and at BYD that design is pretty much frozen in time unhindered and unfazed by A123 taking that tech to its logical conclusion with additives and nanostructuring the chemical contact interfaces and going royally bust in competition with LG as definitive commercial proof of BYD's battery core technology dead end-ness as one could wish for - and the Karma caught *ire regardless and so did the E6 for reasons that were obvious a decade ago or more on the basis of basic common sense. Big wads of self oxygenating reactants separated only by intentionally thin and porous plastic and cased in nylon coated aluminum foil that melts without difficulty if not combusts along with the contents - not good above a critical mass especially when energy density matters in the slightest as it very much does in a vehicle.
The other thing about BYD is a strategic error. Lacking IMO a credible internal driver of innovation and basically reliant on being a contract engineering house with massive access to cheap labor (200,000 employees spread over seven sites at the time) for third party innovators to tap into - what they have actually done is employ a strategy of trying to compete with their customers to the point that they are difficult to trust in a way that Foxxconn with its Taiwanese management isn't. Take BYD a project and more likely than not they'll turn round and make clones of your design under twenty different random brand names and pop them up on Alibaba to see what sticks. Apple for example would not even give them a license to buy one of its iPhone connectors to make an Apple-approved product with - I deduced this because a group of their people asked me to apply for the license and back-door it to them for a cut. Back on point: In the Auto and Automotive battery space BYD has gone too far in trying to take it from both ends. No battery technologist would be mad enough to take them a competent automotive battery design and no auto manufacturer in their right mind would take them a competent vehicle design or any of its manufacturing techniques - so they are kind of muddling in the middle making bad cars with bad batteries - hence the BYD Qin Hybrid of the two - which by the way looks suspiciously like they have reversed an old Toyota Corolla in terms of styling while underneath it's reportedly a stretched BYD F3 platform that famously struggled to even pass a Euro NCAP crash test let alone collect a single star - and yup they are still using the LiFePO4 battery (13KWh lump of prismatic cells), the same basic type which contributed to the BYD E6 having a power to weight ratio that practically prevented it climbing a steep hill. As for the Qin selling in volumes in China, that is not that difficult when the government sets quotas for hybrids and in the case of BYD can effectively buy them from itself in 1000 unit blocks at a time as taxis, subsidize themselves or simply issue purchase vehicle ownership permits to match the quota with nothing else to choose from until the quota is filled - none of it implying any connection to the quality of the vehicle or consumer demand except for demand for a vehicle permit to drive anything at all.
So far they have managed to get Brazil to take a few Qin-s. I suspect NHTSA would fine them on principle for even requesting a US homologation crash test. Like why are you even bothering us when we're busy with cars that might pass?
This is not the Tesla competitor you are looking for.