Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Shorting Oil, Hedging Tesla

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
These all come from the EIA Weekly Petroleum Report released every Wednesday.

Weekly Petroleum Status Report

The week added 2.1 million barrels to US commercial crude inventory, but sell of refinery products was brisk enough to draw total inventory down by 0.4 million barrels for the week. So at least in the US the petroleum products market looks close to balancing, though there is a lot of volatility from week to week.

Most of this is to be expected on grounds of seasonal consumption, and Kuwait missed about 5 million barrels of production this week.

The market seems pretty enthusiastic about this news, but it seems pretty transitory to me. If the Russians and Saudis get into a contest for market share along with Iran and the US, we could easily see another 5 mbpd of supply come to market. This would satisfy demand growth for the next 4 years, extending the glut by about 5 years. This is indicative of just how fragile any sort of brokered priduction decrease is. The market still is not making production decisions on economic grounds, which would curtail investment without any need for collusion.
 
crstuss.gif


This is a good chart to stare at for a while. Notice it was at this time last year and in the five years before that the inventory shrinks a bit. This is the seasonal variation I spoke of before. Technically the market balances whenever inventory is level, but the absolute inventory needs to come down to about 380 million barrels, about 160 million lower than where it is now to really be in the clear.
 
There is currently almost no revenue to the kingdom outside of oil, you can't just take an entire nation that has no marketable skills and create industry. They just spent $10B on a banking district which is not attracting any banks.

This prince talks about cutting spending as if that won't immediately start the clock ticking on the royal family. The only reason revolution gathered no momentum during the Arab Spring is because Saudi Arabia's citizens are handed buckets of cash every week, even more so after the spring of 2011. Without that level of payoff, the royal family will not be able to maintain control and this new "vision" won't see step 1.
 
There is currently almost no revenue to the kingdom outside of oil, you can't just take an entire nation that has no marketable skills and create industry. They just spent $10B on a banking district which is not attracting any banks.

This prince talks about cutting spending as if that won't immediately start the clock ticking on the royal family. The only reason revolution gathered no momentum during the Arab Spring is because Saudi Arabia's citizens are handed buckets of cash every week, even more so after the spring of 2011. Without that level of payoff, the royal family will not be able to maintain control and this new "vision" won't see step 1.
Well, it's not an easy hand to play, but if the royal family wants to retain their power, wealth and heads they've got to make some big changes. They were about 2 years from going broke. But they still have to transform the economy before the oil money runs out.

Regardless the fate of Saudi Arabia, what interests me here is how this divestment of oil can reframe how the world thinks about the future of oil. Essentially the market still believes oil has a future. The futures market says oil is at $53/b going into 2025. This assumes that demand for oil is still growing and that oil prices will necessarily rise high enough to attract the capital needed to maintain supply. But once the market gets a clue as to how demand could start declining by 2025, the gig will be up. There will be no basis for confidence that oil will be over $50/b in 2025 or ever again. So the Saudis need to divest a substantial portion of Aramco before the market comes to this perspective. But they need to divest without signaling this to the market. So basically, they need to IPO before the Model 3 comes out. Not an easy exit strategy, but fascinating to watch. Moreover, the whole oil industry needs to prop up this illusion because if the Aramco IPO bombs, the whole industry will start circling the toilet.
 
So the Saudis need to divest a substantial portion of Aramco before the market comes to this perspective. But they need to divest without signaling this to the market. So basically, they need to IPO before the Model 3 comes out. Not an easy exit strategy, but fascinating to watch. Moreover, the whole oil industry needs to prop up this illusion because if the Aramco IPO bombs, the whole industry will start circling the toilet.

They might succeed in selling 5% of Aramco by 2017. But to which extent can they divest without the stock price collapsing, bringing the value of the public investment fund to half or less of the $2T they've been bragging out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonathan Hewitt
They might succeed in selling 5% of Aramco by 2017. But to which extent can they divest without the stock price collapsing, bringing the value of the public investment fund to half or less of the $2T they've been bragging out?
Yeah, that's the question. Several strategies for monetizing this are possible. 1) They can maximize dividends, which needs to be the case for a business with no need to grow. 2) The oil reserves are not included in the IPO. Rather the Kingdom collects royalties on drilling rights, which may be extended to non-Aramco oil companies. Opening up drilling rights to other producers may also optimize utilization of Aramco's downstream assets such as export terminals. 3) The Kingdom can sell of 5% of equity each year and be fully divested in 20 years, which seems to be their stated objective.

So here's the elephant too big too eat. The Saudis have 260 billion barrels of crude in reserve. They are currently producing at 10.5 mbpd. At that rate it take 68 years to deplete the reserves, but the oil industry does not have nearly that time to remain economically relevant. They need to liquidate this over the next 20 to 30 years. So they need to be producing 24 to 36 mbpd, more than doubling or tripling current priduction. How do they do that? I think the obvious answer is that they open their fields up to foreign oil producers.

Currently the oil industry spend about $10/b on exploration. Given that oil gets disrupted within 7 to 15 years, only about 66% of the 1.66 trillion proven oil reserves will ever get produced, and climate change may even curtail this more, there really is no need for the industry to blow $10/b on exploration. So if the Saudi oilfields are completely opened up, saving producers $10/b on exploration, this allows the price of oil to come down about $10/b with no loss of profitability to oil producers or downstream. So this strategy would imply a major shift in oil investments and oil prices. Simply put, it's time for the industry to stop searching for yet more oil. We know where plenty of it is already.

How does this impact prices? So if the industry stops blowing $10/b adding to proven reserves. Longer-term price of oil shifts down $10. So the current futures curve has oil at $53 going into 2025. This shifts down to $45 or lower. If this were to happen right now with the spot price at $44, the futures curve would rise in the short term and bend down longterm. This would be a major shock to the oil markets. The futures curve would flatten out, and this could force inventory out of storage, until a steep contango restored. Long story short, spot prices could fall well below $35. And this assume that the pace of production increase is no faster than natural decline elsewhere. But try to imagine the Saudis attempting to double market share over the next 5 years. This would require killing off lots of other producers. This would be horrific. This is one reason why opening up their reserves could be a much more orderly transition. As producers need to replace declining well, their next well could be in Saudi Arabia. Another advantage to opening the fields to foreign producers is that these producers would risk their own capital. Saudia Arabia needs to reserve their capital for nonpetroleum investments.

Let's see how this prince tries to sell the goose while keeping the golden eggs.
 
That is really clever jhm. It's absolutely one way for the Saudis to try to play this. I too chuckled when reading about the 2 trillion dollar fund that could buy GOOGL, AAPL and Berkshire. Yeah sure, 2 trillion today but you have to find buyers first. The Saudis divesting out of oil kind of signals poorer future returns, so why would investors want to pay today's prices?

One other caveat when talking about the possibility of Sauds opening up their oil fields to foreign developers: from what I've read it seems that the level of uncertainty as to how much oil is really left in the ground is high. Not even the best geologists know. For a long time it has been preferable to the Saudis (and other OPEC members) to exaggerate their reserves, due to production quotas and for power/political reasons. There are very few pure scientific reports when it comes to the actual reserves, but lots of politics and propaganda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: replicant
Very interesting stuff jhm.

If they wanted to divest at 5%.....Not only would they need to make their reserves MUCH more transparent, they would also open themselves up to financial scrutiny. What are the implications of that? Putting down accurately on paper the profit scheme and where the profits are currently going is not a card they can play. That's a revolution spark that couldn't be extinguished.

People are greatly underestimating how tenuous their control is over this situation. There are very finite limits to how far the royal family can push down payouts and push up things like VAT tax. They have no cards to play, so they're limited to a string of bluffs. Continually bluffing lasts for about 2 minutes.

They cannot transition out of oil and retain power.
They cannot divest from oil at 5% per year without total social upheaval and loss of power.
If retaining power is the only goal then we must assume that all of this is talk.

Very likely their only real option is to pump like mad as jhm described above. Isn't that precisely what we're seeing to date? Have any of these other things ever been anything more than talk.
 
Here's an ideas for how to commoditize the Saudi oil reserves. Note that oil exploration market is about $350B/y to expand proven reserves about 600 to 700 M barrels per week. So the objective here is for the Saudis to tap that market without overwhelming it. It is also helpful to enhance transparency and price discovery. So with this in mind, the Saudis:

  • Divide say 250 B in reserves into about a 1000 plots.
  • Hold a weekly auction where investor bid on any available plot for drilling rights.
  • Bids with the highest price per barrel of reserve win
  • An average of about 500 million barrels of drilling rights are sold.
So in about 10 years the whole reserve is sold off. This is fast enough to capture most of the market for reserves, but slow enough not to depress market prices. Most valuable portions are sold first at the highest price, so most of the value is captured within just a few years. Price discovery happens weekly providing transparency to the financial markets. This makes the reserves something of a commodity in its own right. Price discovery also happens geographically as bids come in for individual plots. This provides transparency both to financial markets and infrastructure planners. As infrastructure is planned and built out that will impact bids on available plots benefiting from that infrastructure.

So how does Aramco benefit? Aramco continues to operate existing wells, but has no need to invest in further drilling. Rather, Aramco owns and operates downstream asset to transport, refine and market virtually all oil produced in Saudi Arabia. As developers increase production, these infrastructural downstream assets become more valuable. I've read that many of this assets are underutilized having been built up for strategic reasons so as to be a swing produces. So increasing utilization is key improving value. With this sort of strategy I think the market cap for Aramco could be stellar and quite durable even as the Saudis sell off 5%, maybe even 10%, every year. Essentially, every producer drawn into the Saudi oilfields will want to own a portion of Aramco as it holds a monopoly downstream of their wells. That is, to avoid the risk of losing excess profit to this monopoly, the upstream producers will want a share of the dividends. So as the share of the reserves become foreign owned, shares of Aramco become foreign owned too. If the balance of ownership in Aramco is too skew, then the weekly reserve auction prices could suffer. So market transparency both for the stock and the reserves provides feedback mechanisms to divest in a controlled way.

What do foreign producers get out of this? Saudi Arabia has some of the lowest production costs in the world around $5/b. Aramco infrastructure and the reserve auctions make it easy to enter this market. A producer needs to buy a claim in the auction, drill and pump. So the question is, how much is an oil producer willing to pay at auction for this opportunity? For the next ten years, this is easily the best opportunity on the planet for developers. Sure once the Saudi reserves are fully tapped, they can go back to exploring the arctic ocean floors or whatever, but in the next decade no one in the industry can afford to pass on bonanza in the Saudi reserves. And they can't afford to pass up on Aramco shares either.

Under this scheme, does it matter whether the oil industry understands that it is toast in 10 to 15 years? Not nearly as much, because while investment has flowed into the cheap oil in Saudi Arabia, this has diverted investment away from riskier investments in expensive oil such a deep sea operations. Even investors who understand how fasted demand will fall off ten years from now can make a more rational choice to invest in Aramco because there are substantial dividends to earn at the lowest risk in the industry.

Prince Mohammed has said that it won't matter what price oil trades at. $30/b or $70/b, it will be all the same to the Saudi. I think this sort of scheme fits that bill. They auction off nearly all the value in the reserves within five years capturing the future value of oil around $53/b right now, and Aramco makes money off of production with very little oil price risk. It's the foreign developers who bear the brunt of oil price risk against their investment in Saudi oil. So, yeah, the Saudis could pull in more than $2 trillion and become nearly risk neutral on the price of oil in less than ten years. And they can do this in a very upfront and transparent way.
 
Crude Oil Tankers Bound For China Surge Amid Stockpiling Signals

The vessels en route to China will deliver about 4 million barrels a day based on standard cargo sizes of 2 million each and the range of dates when they’re due to arrive. Its total imports in March jumped to 32.6 million metric tons, or about 7.7 million barrels a day. The ships monitored are called very large crude carriers, the industry’s biggest. China also receives supplies by pipeline and on smaller tankers.
 
Oil-reliant Saudi Arabia unveils economic reforms plan
Cabinet approves Saudi Vision 2030

Still not much we didn't already know. But Saudi Cabinet has approve Vision 2030 and will release detail over the next 6 weeks.

Updating our working facts: "The country has proven oil reserves of 267 billion barrels and potential reserves of up to 900 billion." So I still anticipate they need a plan to liquidate the proven reserves over about 10 years and whatever is left of the potential reserves over the following 10 years. Essentially, they could sell off about 500 million barrels of proven reserves every week for 20 or more years.

Honestly, I don't see how the Saudis can rationalize just tapping these reserves at only 10.5 mbpd. So the world produced 565k EVs in 2015, and it needs to reach annual production of 25M to disrupt the oil industry. So to do this by 2025 requires an annualized growth rate of 46%. This is probably way too bullish on EVs, for anyone in the oil industry. But how about disruption by 2035? That takes a growth rate of 21%. Perhaps Prince Mohammed thinks 2030 and actually believes a EV growth rate of 29%. But the view that the oil industry has 30 years, 2045 requires belief that EVs grow no faster than 13.5%. But at the current rate of production, 10.5 mbpd, the Saudis are sitting on a 70 year supply of proven oil reserves. Every year that EVs and renewables advance, these reserves are losing potential on the open market. So I can't see how they can afford the risk that EVs continue to advance more than 46% each year. That means they seriously need to find buyers for these reserves over the next 10 years. So I keep watching for details that confirm or invalidate my hypothesis.
 
Well, oil is down nearly 2% today.

The information coming out of KSA today is too vague to really stir up the market. The unveiling seems more about shoring up domestic popular support than dealing out detail for investors.

The market is also bracing itself for earnings season as oil majors give us more visibility into how things are playing out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: replicant
I feel like we're in one of those infomercials that promises to teach you to make millions. If Saudi reserves were advantageous to own in the future, they wouldn't be selling them.
Can I interest you in the amazing investment concept called time sharing?

Seriously, my thesis is that there is definitely a shelf life to reserve. If you owned a portion of those reserves, you could make plenty of money off of it over the next 10 to 20 years. But if you take that same portion of reserves and do nothing with it for 30 years, the oil may not even be valuable enough to drill for. So imagine that the value of those reserve declines by half every 10 years. So today the Saudis could fetch $8/b, but in 2025 just $4/b, and in 2035 $2/b, and so on. If the value of reserve decines over time, then the Saudis are money ahead to liquidate earlier than later.

So if the Saudis take this path, it will upset the oil markets. The going assumption has been that reserves retain their value or even grow in value. Under that assumption, it seems reasonable for all players to hold onto their reserves and replenish them as they draw them down. So the Saudis could signal divestment for the whole industry. Oil companies coukd see their balance sheets decline quite rapidly and share prices with it.
 
I feel like we're in one of those infomercials that promises to teach you to make millions. If Saudi reserves were advantageous to own in the future, they wouldn't be selling them.

This exactly. That's the reason I chuckled when everyone started rehashing the notion of "we're going to sell 5% of Aramco and create the world's largest fund with the $2 trillion raised" or similar. Well guess what, you need to find buyers first... You don't decide what 5% of anything is worth - the market does.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Jonathan Hewitt
This exactly. That's the reason I chuckled when everyone started rehashing the notion of "we're going to sell 5% of Aramco and create the world's largest fund with the $2 trillion raised" or similar. Well guess what, you need to find buyers first... You don't decide what 5% of anything is worth - the market does.
Right. And it gets worse, that Aramco does not include all the oil reserves. For the most part Aramco is just the downstream infrastructure for Saudi oilfields. So the value of those assets depend critically on how aggressively the oil reserves are tapped. So it does not add up to a compelling IPO without a compelling plan for tapping reserves.

So either the Aramco IPO is a really dumb play, just dumping assets on the market like a flea market sale, or there is some clever play in the works to make it a stroke of genius.

Incidentally, Prince Mohammad likes to see himself as a kind of Steve Jobs character. Perhaps he could aim a little higher towards the Elon Musk level. In any case, he may be capable of counterintuitive strategy. If you turn this around and suppose that Elon Musk found himself as second in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, what would a prince Musk do to get the Kingdom out of oil? So with Musk you get a clearer sense of where new investments could go, but even Musk would need a clever divestment strategy that does not kill the value of oil assets before they can be sold.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cattledog