TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

SpaceX's Rising Tide - Discussion of non-SpaceX launch companies

Discussion in 'SpaceX' started by bxr140, May 22, 2019.

  1. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    I realize the scuttlebutt on Oneweb has been scattered around a couple threads--this seems like probably the best place but mods feel free to move.

    Caleb did a webinar with some industry analysts on the Onweb situation. Its a little dry, definitely long, and the first four minutes will give you PTSD from every meeting you've been on in the past month, but there's some good nuggets in there too, including adjacent analysis of Starlink.
    Webinar | OneWeb’s Bankruptcy: Impacts and Implications for the Satellite Industry - SpaceNews.com
     
    • Informative x 1
  2. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Rocketlab's practice run at booster recovery.
     
    • Like x 2
  3. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    Thanks for posting that video. Great demonstration! But the hyper-dramatic music made it sound like that RocketLab helicopter had just saved the world from total destruction. :rolleyes:
     
    • Funny x 3
  4. mspohr

    mspohr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    8,943
    Location:
    California
    Russia space chief spars with Elon Musk over launch pricing

    The head of Russia's space agency on Saturday accused Elon Musk's SpaceX of predatory pricing for space launches, which is pushing Russia to cut its own prices.
    Musk responded to the criticism Saturday by saying on Twitter: "SpaceX rockets are 80% reusable, theirs are 0%. This is the actual problem."
     
  5. ecarfan

    ecarfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    19,181
    Location:
    San Mateo, CA
    Love it. I’m sure Elon had to restrain himself from even blunter language. :cool:
     
  6. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    There is some article that points out Russia has 56 Soyuz rockets sitting around. So it's not like Russia has an inventory problem.
     
  7. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    There's inventory, but its a tangled web for sure. Rogozin's "...dumping by American companies financed by the US budget..." comment rings a bit hollow given the fact that pretty much everything in Russia is state sponsored to some degree or another. Then fold in the oligarchs that basically control everything anyway and won't allow things to happen without bags of cash...
     
    • Like x 1
  8. Grendal

    Grendal SpaceX Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
    Rocketlab rolled out an Electron for testing at their new launch facility in Virginia (Wallops).

    Rocket Lab on Twitter
     
  9. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #69 bxr140, May 4, 2020
    Last edited: May 4, 2020
  10. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    And since I'm catching up on SpaceNews, Telesat is threatening to actually make a decision this summer. While this timeline was probably not too impacted by the Oneweb bankruptcy, I'm sure its still nice to basically lose a competitor.

    I think pretty much the best chance Telesat has of being successful is the fact that they're a traditional for profit company. So...they're going to come up with a solution (if they can find one) that actually makes money--that means Cap/Opex are balanced with revenue, the terminal cost is bearable, and the user fees are manageable. Starlink obviously has a huge head start in this two horse race; the creative/hope-real-hard accounting from SpaceX is their big variable.

    Telesat preparing for mid-2020 constellation manufacturer selection - SpaceNews.com
     
    • Informative x 1
  11. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    Huge cascading news week. This is mostly just a link-to-Spacenews post, but there's a ton of stuff going on. This isn't exactly "rising tide" stuff but, again, I think this is the main non-SpaceX thread...

    1. Not long after talk of Jupiter-3 delays (the mega HughesNet sat under construction at Maxar) for which Maxar is essentially claiming force majure:
    EchoStar says Jupiter-3 launch timing clouded by coronavirus - SpaceNews.com

    2. Maxar signs an undisclosed GEO contract that people speculate is either Intelsat or SES (or both--they've been looking for a common, low cost C-band satellite they can both use to replace their legacy c-band services).
    Maxar announces multi-satellite GEO order as pandemic crimps quarter - SpaceNews.com

    3. Then, BOOM, Intelsat files for bankruptcy, with arguably the biggest wildcard there being their C-band spectrum (relative to the whole C-band *sugar* show that's been going on for a while)
    Intelsat declares bankruptcy as means to fund C-band spectrum clearing - SpaceNews.com

    4. AND THEN, Spaceforce <said with a whisp> comes in and says "HET!" to Jai-nuh on ambulance chasing bankrupt American space companies (ostensibly, OneWeb, and now Intelsat)
    Space Force vice commander: China can’t be allowed to buy bankrupt U.S. space companies - SpaceNews.com
     
    • Informative x 6
  12. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #72 bxr140, May 14, 2020
    Last edited: May 14, 2020
    • Informative x 1
  13. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    I wouldn't go so far as to call SAD's Tranche 0/1 concept a bellwether, but since it is one of the The Man's first constellations in the new era of LEO (obviously, there's also Blackjack which is farther along), following this and other concepts will certainly be telling with respect to how important things like speed and price are relative to legacy program requirements like documentation/traceability and per-satellite reliability (<ahem> and figuring out how to award contracts to incumbents </ahem>).

    Almost certainly the satellite constellation is a bridge too far for SpaceX, but obviously they're well suited for the launch opportunity. What I'm curious to follow is how the launch RFI informs an RFP, and more specifically how the criteria by which the winners are graded are developed.
     
  14. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    • Informative x 1
    • Like x 1
  15. Electroman

    Electroman Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    6,104
    Location:
    TX
  16. hmcgregoraz

    hmcgregoraz Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2014
    Messages:
    107
    Location:
    Tucson AZ USA
    Because a Falcon9 would be hugely overkill and way too expensive for a single shot, single satellite, replacement on demand duty.

    The right tool for the right job. It would be trying to do finish carpentry with a 50 pound sledge hammer.

    -Harry
     
    • Like x 2
  17. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    Right, And Iridium is a high end commercial customer that can afford to pay a little bit more for a dedicated launch rather than be at the mercy of uncertain rideshare timelines, which is the best that SpaceX could do for such a payload.
     
    • Like x 1
  18. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    Plus they use polar orbits which Starlink is not filling at this point.
     
  19. bxr140

    bxr140 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Location:
    Bay Area
    All valid replies thus far.

    On the commercial side, No doubt there's also a really attractive price that makes it really attractive for Iridium, and then of course Relativity gets the market exposure. Program cycles are so long in the space biz that its often about the contracts/backlog you have and not necessarily the programs you've executed.

    There's probably also an element where this is more of a MOU than a hard contract, or at a minimum the contract has a lot of outs given that Relativity hasn't actually launched anything yet. Certainly Iridium is sourcing a backup launcher--as most commercial launches do--so its still possible SpaceX is in the mix.

    On the technical side, launching replacement sats into the the 6 polar Iridium planes requires a direct shot into the intended plane, almost certainly just a single sat because the odds of two sats failing in one plane is pretty low. For those who read my babbling over in the starlink thread recently there's a phenomenon called precession, where orbital planes rotate around the earth at different rates. This lets you launch sats into the "wrong" plane and wait til the "right" plane comes around, but that won't work at all for Iridium's polar inclinations. Recall that Starlinks need about a month to phase one plane over. An iridium sat would require ~16 months or so to phase one plane over. If it really was intended as an on orbit spare that might be barely acceptable, but if you're trying to replace a failed sat that's not good for business. So...a big rocket that can huck a ton of mass into space isn't the most ideal tool for the job.

    Last, if not least, SpaceX isn't the easiest company to work with. PR fluff pieces on the relationship aside, its possible Iridium would prefer a different customer experience.
     
    • Informative x 1
  20. Cosmacelf

    Cosmacelf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2013
    Messages:
    8,229
    Location:
    San Diego
    Do tell...
     

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC