There are still a few issues with the current RFP - the "no funding chargers withing 20 miles of an existing site" takes all of 101 of the list, knocks out Lancaster because of a 50kW Chademo/CCS at a campground that is closed/inaccessible >6 months out of the year (Oct-May), and also eliminates the Hooksett rest areas. The requirement to install both L2 and L3 is sort of boneheaded IMHO - totally different use cases. Through travelers won't sit at a gas station or rest area for hours on an L2.
A lot of the problem is that the rules seem to be being written by people with no actual experience with using an EV.
In particular, the constraint that you have to get back to the car to at least repark when its full can be an issue. L2 charging is fine at a mall, or outside a restaurant, or even in many public parking lots - people will be there short enough, or be able to come back soon enough, to not let it sit after finishing charging. Conversely, L2s make little sense at a commuter rail station, where people usually can't be back for 9+ hours. Only very rarely can an EV sit on an L2 for that long without getting full. A row of parking with ordinary 120V sockets would serve them better.
L2 at street parking is a great thing downtown, but again, a royal pain in the ass for overnight parking in a residential area, if 'must be charging' is enforced. Easy access to 120V sockets (L1) would probably be best, if L3 wasn't too far away.
I have stayed overnight at hotels that had L2 chargers, but no time restriction. That was nice. There are still few enough EVs that I didn't have to worry about hogging a slot.
L3 charging is getting faster - I rarely need to stop more than 20 minutes at a 250 kW charger, so the number of things I can do while waiting is pretty restricted. Dense residential areas where people don't have dedicated overnight parking need access to L3, not just through-travellers on highways.