Too late, Musk is listed as CEO now and Zeev as vice Chairman...hmm... why the constant changes in the CEO position?
Cobos
Cobos
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would hope so too... although obviously they are having some sort of cash flow issues.The deposits are not in an escrow account, and they are free to use it if they so choose. Thus if they go under, I expect we will lose our deposits. But, the deposts are not their primary source of capital. Also, I think it would be reckless to spend a significant portion of the deposits on anything other than direct production costs. I trust Tesla to be more responsible than that.
Cash flow arguments aside, I can't imagine they could lay off half of the company and continue work on Model S without totally blowing their late 2010 goal.
Siri said that the number of layoffs has not been finalized, because it was unclear how many employees from its offices in Rochester Hills, Mich., and England would be absorbed into the Northern California headquarters.
From the LA Times:
Tesla Feels Credit Crunch | Up to Speed | Los Angeles Times
This is the first I have heard they are reducing head count in England as well.
I would hope so too... although obviously they are having some sort of cash flow issues.
Yes :-(... I am bummed that the Model S is being delayed. It sounds like from their web site they are doing exactly what I was thinking earlier: Lay off a bunch of people until the loans come in for the Model S, and then hire people back. Seems like a short sighted plan unless you are very cash strapped.
Jeff Rusch wrote on October 15th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
If I’m remembering rightly, after Martin’s ouster, one of the first things Ze’ev did was cancel what seemed like a large and lucrative side business selling the Tesla ESS to Th!nk for their city EV. I presume Elon was in agreement about this move. At the time, the reason given was to increase focus on the core task. I’m no expert, but in retrospect, maybe Martin was right, and such a side business would be helping their cash flow right now?