sakimano
Active Member
the negative reactions to price aren't really fair.
If you're comparing a Tesla solar roof that looks like a slate (real or manufactured) roof, you ought to compare it to a slate roof.
On that house above that was shown to be 2000 square feet, the roof, if slate, would probably cost about $30,000-40,000, maybe more depending on the pitch of the roof.
Then factor in electricity savings of about $50-100/month and you're looking at $6,000-12,000 every 10 years.
You also have a bit of an asset in the roof as when you're selling your house you can advertise that as a premium.
I still don't think it's going to be 'cheaper' than getting a slate roof. I also don't think getting a Tesla Model S P90D is cheaper than an Audi RS7, but I still bought one. There's a little more going on.
When you consider you're also futureproofing yourself from the price escalation that we keep seeing in electricity, that's pretty cool too.
If you're comparing a Tesla solar roof that looks like a slate (real or manufactured) roof, you ought to compare it to a slate roof.
On that house above that was shown to be 2000 square feet, the roof, if slate, would probably cost about $30,000-40,000, maybe more depending on the pitch of the roof.
Then factor in electricity savings of about $50-100/month and you're looking at $6,000-12,000 every 10 years.
You also have a bit of an asset in the roof as when you're selling your house you can advertise that as a premium.
I still don't think it's going to be 'cheaper' than getting a slate roof. I also don't think getting a Tesla Model S P90D is cheaper than an Audi RS7, but I still bought one. There's a little more going on.
When you consider you're also futureproofing yourself from the price escalation that we keep seeing in electricity, that's pretty cool too.