dc_h
Active Member
The planned production implies enough for the S and X and possibly the Roadster, not enough for the Y and they’re contracted to use Panasonic batteries for the next 3 years.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We were running a data collection Autonomous fleet for a German OEM in Berlin and the instructions to us were simple. The data can be handled with 3rd party ONLY and ONLY if the faces and License plates were blurred and that the cars carried marketing information on them that enabled people to look us up online.
Exactly what "Third Party" would Tesla be using here?
As far as I can tell, this is yet another example of how Tesla's vertical integration places if far, far ahead of others . . . .
For us long-term investors this feels like a potential FUD attack--which could lead to another opportunity to buy TSLA "On Sale!" today?
are you sure Tesla is using Scale AI?They use Scale AI to label data
Yes. I aint sure if this should have been kept a secret. I have my inside sourcesare you sure Tesla is using Scale AI?
The linked article's advice was to create a charitable trust, offload appreciated shares to it, the self said shares, and hand the money back to yourself in annual distributions.I couldn't edit my other response, and realized I didn't answer your question.
- I don't think using any particular tax rule makes someone immoral.
- I don't presume to know someone's intentions based on the tax rules they use
- I consider some tax rules to be unwise or unfair, and will vote to change them.
- I believe too many people nowadays presume to know other's intentions or attitudes without nearly enough information.
If improving batteries in cost, durability and range is gonna lose Tesla a handful of racing customers, it's still a genius move.
Sorry but the mission is more important than races. Buy a Porsche.
Dude buying puts based on what someone posted on the internet?
Look on the bright side.
We are having a last minute sale before battery day.
This is akin to the arguments made by some some folks that hybrids should be called EV's because it's possible to drive them primarily on battery by only using a subset of it's range or capability.
The reality is that a platform should be evaluated as a whole. While it may be possible reduce emissions by only using a fraction of the vehicle's specified capability, that really isn't painting an accurate picture of what it may emit when used as designed to it's full capability.
Am I alone in thinking we're going to tank after battery day, no matter how good it is? I then expect a rebound much higher after a week or so once the implications properly sink in with the wider investing community.