Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
Yes, here's the heat sink and cooling fans viewed edge on.You sure about S and X not having liquid cooled AP computer?
Inside the NVIDIA PX2 board on my HW2 AP2.0 Model S (with Pics!)
Cheers!
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, here's the heat sink and cooling fans viewed edge on.You sure about S and X not having liquid cooled AP computer?
India's car sales are comparable to Germany's in volume, rather than China. But the ASP is much lower and BMW & Mercedes together sold about 25k cars in 2018. So, I think 10k / year would be a high mark for Tesla.Not sure what the comparative middle classes are of India cf. China.
It really doesn't matter even if TSLA lose money on the SR model. Its classic inverse decoy pricing. They lure you in with an incredibly cheap car, and then once you're on their website they encourage you to buy something better. As long as the profit from people who buy SR+ or even higher exceeds the losses from total bare-bones SR sales, its a financial win.
And super-long term, those people who buy SR might have a better job/more income in future, and are very likely to stick with the brand. How many people will buy an SR in the first job/2nd job and an S/X/P3 a decade later?
There are state laws that will not allow an auto manufacturer to sell a car if that manufacture has a signatory franchise dealership. Even if it is a franchise in another state. That’s one of the reasons Tesla can not have a franchise dealer in a single state. It would void their store in another state.If anyone knows better, feel free to correct me, but I think Jonas is actually wrong here:
Morgan Stanley says automakers want to sell cars like Tesla does but can't: 'It's against the law'
Other manufacturers can’t legally sell cars the way Tesla *used* to(in self-owned stores), but I don’t believe there’s any legal grounds for a ban on them selling via their websites rather than via a physical store. Such a ban in any state would violate the interstate commerce clause(the ban on self-owned stores arguably doesn’t, as it just prevents them from owning such a storefront within the state). Barring federal laws preventing it, I think Tesla just opened the floodgates for all manufacturers who want to sell directly to customers.
How else will you keep the label from scratching you?Expect a market turnaround shortly. Before to call for prayers with offering of food to Buddha and spirit of the house and immediate place radiating outwards, I underwent inspection. My SM (significant mother, sargeant major, wife) noticed my pyjama pants were wrong side out. That has now been corrected. Not an advice.
India's car sales are comparable to Germany's in volume, rather than China. But the ASP is much lower and BMW & Mercedes together sold about 25k cars in 2018. So, I think 10k / year would be a high mark for Tesla.
View attachment 383254
It really doesn't matter even if TSLA lose money on the SR model. Its classic inverse decoy pricing. They lure you in with an incredibly cheap car, and then once you are in the store they encourage you to buy something better.
A big question as to how much more profitable SR+ is than SR is, "is the website correct?" The site lists SR and SR+ as having the same weight. If they're truly the same number of cells, then it's just power seats, extra speakers, and fog lamps. Not that expensive at all, that upgrade would be overwhelmingly profit.
And yeah, all anecdotal evidence I'm seeing is that SR+ is a lot more popular than SR.
Rephrasing this point to make even more compelling: Would you rather order online, or pay $2500 for a test drive? Honestly?Investors should ask themselves if they were a customer, would you rather get to sit in the car at a boutique, or save yourself $2,500 by ordering online?
For me it’s a no brainer, I can use that $2,500 to upgrade to Autopilot.
If the website weights are correct then:
In the "game of pennies" so much software limited hardware doesn't make much sense. I think the cars currently on sale do not use the new module design, as the new module machine ramps up I'm sure we'll see the weights reduced and margins increase.
- LR RWD is software limited LR AWD. This would have 4,416 cells and 76.4kwh battery (useable capacity a bit lower)
- MR RWD still has the same pack as LR, but the 2 modules are smaller with 3744 total cells and 64.8kwh.
- SR+ again has the same pack as LR, but 2 modules are smaller again with 3,456 total cells and 59.8kwh
- SR is a software limited SR+.
Let's be clear - if you're a well-heeled celebrity and don't have a Tesla as at least your daily driver, then you're lame.
How else will you keep the label from scratching you?
I have a little fantasy that Musk is talking with certain banks about a deal to acquire CVNA.
They are staggering numbers in China!India's car sales are comparable to Germany's in volume, rather than China. But the ASP is much lower and BMW & Mercedes together sold about 25k cars in 2018. So, I think 10k / year would be a high mark for Tesla.
View attachment 383254
Sure seems like we should be. Nothing against the S/X--they're great cars. But it seems unquestionably true to me that some significant subset of S/X buyers bought them not because they specifically required a giant sedan or an SUV, but because they wanted an EV that didn't suck. Today, if you're not tied to the form factor or ludicrous speeds, the Model 3 at half the cost is tough to ignore.
They are staggering numbers in China!
Perspective on why the Chinese GF is monumentally important