Don't know why all the hate on Gary. Everything he is saying is pretty reasonable and I feel like he's much better at defending Tesla and his thesis than some of the bulls from CNBC interviews. Anyways, watch this as he has some information on fund manager's weight on Tesla. Spoiler alert, many of them didn't have Tesla but started buying after Q2. He speculates with Twitter, Google, Snap, and FB falling, fund managers will be looking for winners tomorrow.
Gary is really smart and acts with first hand knowledge of how money moves in the trading industry (Portfolio Managers).
What he does on Twitter is very useful for explaining Tesla to a broader audience (including me).
Current TSLA stock price is likely 10% higher at this point in time because of the clarity of his communications. I am not saying he is responsible for that value. He is responsible for it being recognized in the stock price at this point in time. He pulls recognized value forward.
I appreciate both Gary and the contributions of the people on this board.
Now to answer your question about why all the hate on Gary. I can only speak for myself, and it is not hate.
1) He tries for force (badger) Tesla/Elon into the pattern of behavior that plays best to portfolio managers. The big 3 have been playing to portfolio managers for years. This behavior is why they are where they are. So he is trying to force Tesla to be more like GM (in every respect, as you can't pick and choose.) So there is conflict. People here do not want TESLA to perform like GM. Gary does not know that GM like performance is what he is asking for.
2) He thinks Telsa should direct funds to PR and advertising. That means lower R&D expenditures and consequently worse product as the money has to come from somewhere. Someone here pointed at advertising costs vs R&D costs per vehicle for car companies. I parroted it. Reflect on that a while.
3) He has talked about developing a service revenue stream [IIRC]. That means holding customers hostage and extorting money from them. This destroys Net Promoter Score and kills the durable demand that Tesla relies on. If people don't want to tell their friends to become hostages, Tesla flexibility on delivery and upgrades disappears. The company dynamic changes completely and they get trapped in traditional automakers' "pay people to take it" flow requirements.
So Elon and Tesla have worked very hard to structure the company to avoid the pitfalls of the big automakers.
No advertising.
No discounts.
No distribution channel (even though distribution can help you magically dress your numbers at the end of each quarter).
Distribution channel has no voice on the car ( A car salesman is very self confident. Their input is "I am great." "I can sell anything with your badge on it." "Just make it as cheap as possible so I maximize both profit per sale and service revenue." "if you do that for me, I will help you make the numbers look good at the end of each quarter.")
Etc.
Gary yells in Elon's ear to get Elon to behave like they train you to behave in business school, not caring, or understanding that that behavior will make TESLA and it's products mediocre - Just like all the dead and dying companies in, and products from, the rust belt.
So we all know that a Harvard MBA will kill Tesla and make them just like all the other companies with a high concentration of Harvard MBAs.
Do a demographic study.
Gary is taking a run at it and softening Elon up to where caring about Tesla is not worth the trouble. Body blows in early rounds.
He has probably already hastened Telsa's demise by 18 months.
Eventually Elon will hand the reins to a Harvard MBA who will hire their friends and TESLA's moment will have passed. They will start preying on customers, forget about Net Promoter Scores, start advertising, create a PR department to lie to the public before facts are in, and lie to the public to protect stock prices - just like the oil company PR people.
I hope this answers your question. Munro has seen this progression before, first hand. He knows how the story goes.
I like Gary.
Elon is way better at creating wealth.
Gary does not
act as if he respects Elon, or what Elon has done.
[Edited for clarity by adding words and commas here and there.]